2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2017.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An isogeometrical approach to structural level set topology optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the point wise density mapping is directly used in the weak form of the governing equations and the adjoint sensitivity technique is applied to compute the derivative. Jahangiry et al [89] also discussed the application of IGA in the structural level set topology optimization to develop a new level set-based ITO framework, where the control mesh is gradually updated in the optimization iterations, and then the authors also discussed the application of the new level set-based ITO framework in the topology optimization of the concentrated heat flow and uniformly distributed heat generation systems [90]. Lee et al [91] also implemented the isogeometric topological shape optimization using dual evolution with boundary integral equation and level sets, where the implicit geometry using the level sets is transformed into the parametric NURBS curves by minimizing the difference of velocity fields in both representations.…”
Section: Level Set-basedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the point wise density mapping is directly used in the weak form of the governing equations and the adjoint sensitivity technique is applied to compute the derivative. Jahangiry et al [89] also discussed the application of IGA in the structural level set topology optimization to develop a new level set-based ITO framework, where the control mesh is gradually updated in the optimization iterations, and then the authors also discussed the application of the new level set-based ITO framework in the topology optimization of the concentrated heat flow and uniformly distributed heat generation systems [90]. Lee et al [91] also implemented the isogeometric topological shape optimization using dual evolution with boundary integral equation and level sets, where the implicit geometry using the level sets is transformed into the parametric NURBS curves by minimizing the difference of velocity fields in both representations.…”
Section: Level Set-basedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model C shown in Figure 8 is selected as an initial configuration, and the third eigenmode at point M is targeted. In this case, as the components of T ij of the initial unit cell are evaluated as T 11 = −0.11 and T 22 = −1.48, F 2 = T 2 11 is employed for the objective function in Equation (52). Parameters for optimization, d, , dt, and AL , are set at 0.2, 0.0001, 0.01, and 0.01, respectively.…”
Section: Optimization For Metamaterials With Bidirectional Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Dedé et al incorporated the phase‐field model, which is based on the generalized Cahn‐Hilliard equation, with the IG topology optimization. Moreover, level‐set functions were employed for IG topology optimization by Wang and Benson, Jahangiry and Takvakkoli, and Ghasemi et al In these developments, the phase‐field variables or the level‐set functions defining material boundaries are discretized with spline functions to make the best use of the well‐known strong points of IGAs. Apart from this line, Hassani et al developed a density‐based method with IGA, which has been followed by Taheri and Suresh for multimaterial topology optimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IGA was also introduced into the parametric LSM and developed a level‐set–based topology optimization method with IGA, where the level‐set function was interpolated by the NURBS basis functions, rather than using the compactly supported radial basis functions given in the works . In the work of Jahangiry and Tavakkoli, an isogeometric approach was also developed for the level‐set topology optimization, where three different problems were discussed, like the minimizing weight subject to the local stress constraints. Topology optimization with the global stress constraint was also studied in an IGA‐based SIMP framework .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%