2001
DOI: 10.1002/smi.893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An isomorphic theory of stress: the dynamics of person–environment fit

Abstract: A n i s o m o r p h i c t h e o r y o f s t r e s s : t h e d y n a m i c s o f p e r s o n-e n v i r o n m e n t f i t SummaryAn isomorphic theory in the domain of stress refers to a dimension-specific extension of person-environment fit theory. Isomorphism extends person-environment fit theory by focusing attention on corresponding characteristics in the person and the environment; in this case, the control, uncertainty, and interpersonal dimensions. Isomorphic theory overarches and integrates the ecological… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results support the personenvironment fit theory proposed by Quick, Nelson, Quick and Orman (2001), provide hints at how to benefit from acknowledging an interaction effect between the individual and his task-environment, and suggest a more individualized approach to human resources management in Armed Forces.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Our results support the personenvironment fit theory proposed by Quick, Nelson, Quick and Orman (2001), provide hints at how to benefit from acknowledging an interaction effect between the individual and his task-environment, and suggest a more individualized approach to human resources management in Armed Forces.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The original concept of ‘stress’ was used to describe a set of physiological and psychological responses to adverse external conditions or influences (Selye, , ; Maslach, ; Mayer, ; Quick et al, ). Later, researchers studied the behavioural responses to such external influences as stress, which was conceptualised as a natural consequence of living (Vasse et al, ; Richmond & Kehoe, ).…”
Section: Background Literature and Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible explanation for this finding comes from P-E Fit Theory. Some have suggested that the match between individual preferences and setting characteristics may have a larger impact on individual well-being when the demands of the setting are rigid than when they are flexible (Moos, 1981; Quick, Nelson, Quick, & Orman, 2001). Thus, we might expect mother's preferences for education to play a smaller role in child well-being when setting demands are more flexible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%