2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.101944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An isotopic perspective on the socio-economic significance of livestock in Bronze Age West-Frisia, the Netherlands (2000–800 BCE)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite its demonstrated potential, however, stable isotope analysis has been used very sparingly in Dutch zooarchaeological studies with only a recent increase in its application [e.g. 54 56 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its demonstrated potential, however, stable isotope analysis has been used very sparingly in Dutch zooarchaeological studies with only a recent increase in its application [e.g. 54 56 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While aDNA data can reveal long time-scale demographic developments and mobility, strontium isotopes ( 87 Sr/ 86 Sr) allow us to trace movement on an individual basis and short time scale of both humans and animals (Bentley 2006;Ericson 1985;Montgomery 2010). The data enable us to discuss various kinds of mobility patterns, networks and population dynamics (Brusgaard et al 2019;Frei et al 2015;Frei et al 2019a;Gron et al 2016;Knipper 2011;Montgomery and Evans 2006;Sjögren et al 2009). The strontium (Sr) isotope ratios in humans mirror the isotope composition of bioavailable Sr in the area where people resided, assuming that they consumed locally procured water and food.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recentring coupled human-beaver prehistories aligns with current attempts in archaeology to develop more inclusive accounts of the past (Hill, 2021;Hussain, 2023b;Kay and Haughton, 2019;Pilaar, 2017) and to explore the varying contributions of nonhuman animals to human pursuits and projects (e.g. Armstrong Oma and Goldhahn, 2020;Brusgaard et al, 2019;Harris and Cipolla, 2017;Hill, 2013;Hussain, 2019;Løvschal, 2022;Mannermaa, 2013;Marciniak, 2020;Oma Armstrong, 2018;Overton, 2016;Russell, 2012;Sykes, 2015). Just as animal historians have proposed to employ a dedicated 'animal lens' (Specht, 2016) to disclose new perspectives, insights and understandings of the past, multispecies archaeologists are now beginning to draw attention to the often-underestimated involvement of animal others in the making of prehistory (Fredengren, 2021;Hamilakis and Overton, 2013;Kost and Hussain, 2019;Pilaar, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%