1972
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1972.tb00797.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Item Factor Analysis of the Eysenck Personality Inventory

Abstract: Considering the wide usage of the Eysenck Personality Inventory, it was deemed desirable to critically examine the factorial nature of its Extraversion and Neuroticism scales. Of prime concern were the questions: (1) is the inventory a univocal measure of extraversion and neuroticism, for which it was designed, (2) are primary personality factors replicable ? An item factor analysis (60 variables, 1319 subjects) extracted 15 interpretable, orthogonal (Varimax) factors: Sociability I, Adjustment‐emotionality, I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
4

Year Published

1978
1978
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
17
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it has been the most widely used factor-analytic basedl personality inventory for both application and research, Raymond Cattell's 16PF often has been the object of scathing attacks (e.g., Howarth & Browne, 1971;Saville & Blinkhorn, 1981), moderate criticism (Karson & O'Dell, 1974) and resolute defenses (e.g., Cattell, Eber & Delhees, 1968;Cattell & JSmg, 1986). Without assuming a position on either side of this debate, the purpose of this article is twofold: to contribute to our understanding of the 16PF and to contribute to our understanding of competing methods of scale construction.…”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although it has been the most widely used factor-analytic basedl personality inventory for both application and research, Raymond Cattell's 16PF often has been the object of scathing attacks (e.g., Howarth & Browne, 1971;Saville & Blinkhorn, 1981), moderate criticism (Karson & O'Dell, 1974) and resolute defenses (e.g., Cattell, Eber & Delhees, 1968;Cattell & JSmg, 1986). Without assuming a position on either side of this debate, the purpose of this article is twofold: to contribute to our understanding of the 16PF and to contribute to our understanding of competing methods of scale construction.…”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Another objection which has been made concerning extraversion as a dimension of personality is that the E-scale includes factors of both sociability and impulsivity (Howarth and Browne, 1972). This may be important in considering the relationship between extraversion and school attainment, but it hardly seems to undermine the presumed relationship between outgoing personalities and outdoor play.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Prije svih, najmarkatnije se izdvaja pitanje faktorske strukture 16PF upitnika, što predstavlja najdirektniji udar na valjanost intrumenta u cjelini. Brojni su napori poduzeti od strane nezavisnih autora koji su pokušali da dobiju strukturu 16 faktora pretpostavljenih od autora upitnika (Adcock & Adcock, 1977;Burdsall & Bolton, 1979;Eysenck & Eysenck, 1969;Fiske, 1949;Howarth & Browne, 1971;Karson & OʼDell, 1974;Kline & Barrett, 1983;Sells, Demaree, & Will, 1970). No, za većinu ovih pokušaja može se reći da su bili neuspješni.…”
Section: Uvodunclassified
“…No, za većinu ovih pokušaja može se reći da su bili neuspješni. Howarth i Browne (Howarth & Browne, 1971) su tako, koristeći četvrtu reviziju upitnika, našli 10 interpretabilnih faktora koji se nisu poklapali sa logikom rasporeda stavki kako je to pretpostavio Raymond Cattell. Faktorsko analitička studija koju su proveli Sells, Demaree i Will (Demaree & Will, 1970) kao i studija koju su poduzeli Eysenck i Eysenck (Eysenck & Eysenck, 1969), također nije dale dokaze o Cattellovim navodima o broju primarnih faktora.…”
Section: Uvodunclassified