1979
DOI: 10.1016/s0019-9958(79)90719-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An iteration method for calculating the relative capacity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the block lengths in the SC have bounded finite length and the duplication distribution has finite support, then the corresponding matrix is finite. In this case, capacity per unit cost given a matrix can be computed numerically, using a variation of the Blahut-Arimoto algorithm for calculating the capacity, under the conditions that we are dealing with finite alphabets and positive symbol costs, as is the case here [6]. This approach does not give an actual efficient coding scheme, but yields a distribution of block lengths, from which the capacity per unit cost can be derived.…”
Section: Lower Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the block lengths in the SC have bounded finite length and the duplication distribution has finite support, then the corresponding matrix is finite. In this case, capacity per unit cost given a matrix can be computed numerically, using a variation of the Blahut-Arimoto algorithm for calculating the capacity, under the conditions that we are dealing with finite alphabets and positive symbol costs, as is the case here [6]. This approach does not give an actual efficient coding scheme, but yields a distribution of block lengths, from which the capacity per unit cost can be derived.…”
Section: Lower Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discussion [Comparison with other bounds]: To compare Theorem 2 with the numerical results reported by [9] for sticky channels, the upper and lower bounds proposed by [9] have to be implemented using the Jimbo-Kunisawa iterative algorithm [13]. These bounds are based on a mapping that transforms a sticky channel into a discrete memory channel with integer alphabets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, for a channel C, with information alphabet X, we can calculate an associated unit-cost capacity C(C; |X|), and determine optimal capacity-achieving input probabilities. The capacity achieving distribution p(x) can be obtained by JimboKunisawa algorithm [15]. The distribution transformer is readily achieved by employing arithmetic decoder, which is widely used in source coding applications [16].…”
Section: B Distribution Transformermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5. shows the capacity estimates of this channels for various values of p and alphabet size |X| obtained by the Jimbo-Kunisawa algorithm [15]. The region of low channel deletion probability is of practical interest as in this case the watermark can be efficiently protected by a code.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%