2023
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2023.3313586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Iterative Classification and Semantic Segmentation Network for Old Landslide Detection Using High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images

Zili Lu,
Yuexing Peng,
Wei Li
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, mapping ancient landslides from high-resolution remote sensing images (HRSIs) poses significant challenges due to their transformed morphology over time and resemblance to surroundings. Addressing these challenges, a novel Iterative Classification and Semantic Segmentation Network (ICSSN) [116] was proposed. This network improves classification at both the object and pixel levels by iteratively enhancing the shared feature extraction module.…”
Section: Landslide Mapping (Pixel-level)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, mapping ancient landslides from high-resolution remote sensing images (HRSIs) poses significant challenges due to their transformed morphology over time and resemblance to surroundings. Addressing these challenges, a novel Iterative Classification and Semantic Segmentation Network (ICSSN) [116] was proposed. This network improves classification at both the object and pixel levels by iteratively enhancing the shared feature extraction module.…”
Section: Landslide Mapping (Pixel-level)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings suggest the importance of selecting the appropriate deep learning model based on the specific characteristics of the landslide. Considering the dynamic, nonlinear, and unstable nature of landslides, Li et al (2023) [145] proposed a dynamic model based on CNN-LSTM for landslide displacement prediction. This model decomposes displacements into trend, periodic, and random components, with a least square quintic polynomial function modeling the trend and CNN-LSTM predicting the periodic and random displacements.…”
Section: Landslide Displacement Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the detection of old landslides still faces technical challenges that need to be solved in relevant research areas. The presence of old landslides is characterized by their long history and considerable time interval, leading to various degrees of transformation over time [20]. Subsequent to the occurrence of a landslide, vegetation often reestablishes itself over several years, blending with the surrounding environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, differentiating old landslides from recent ones primarily relies on scrutinizing the inherent morphological characteristics of the landslide itself and identifying certain traces of human-induced alteration [21]. Zili et al [20] designed an iterative classification and semantic segmentation network to classify and segment old landslides on the Loess Plateau, and the results show that the designed network is extremely effective for old landslides that are difficult to identify there. For the semantic segmentation task, the F1 score increased from 0.5054 to 0.5448 and the detection accuracy of the old landslide improved to 0.9 compared to the basic network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although accurate, these methods are inefficient and pose safety risks [ 6 ]. Recent advancements in remote sensing technology provide new perspectives and means for landslide detection, such as high-resolution imagery [ 7 , 8 , 9 ], Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) interferometry [ 10 , 11 ] and LiDAR [ 12 , 13 , 14 ]. These data have led scholars to propose various automatic landslide detection methods, with optical remote sensing imagery offering rich spectral information and high-resolution surface images, aiding in distinguishing landslides from other land cover types [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%