2014
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2013.2283018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Iterative Magnetomechanical Deflection Model for a Magnetic Gear

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, further improvements in torque density are still needed in order to make them competitive with mechanical gearboxes. The mechanical assembly of the MG is perhaps one of the most challenging aspects of designing a MG and the central inner steel segments, called the cage rotor in this paper, are particularly difficult to design as they carry high torque and experience large oscillatory radial and azimuthal forces [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, further improvements in torque density are still needed in order to make them competitive with mechanical gearboxes. The mechanical assembly of the MG is perhaps one of the most challenging aspects of designing a MG and the central inner steel segments, called the cage rotor in this paper, are particularly difficult to design as they carry high torque and experience large oscillatory radial and azimuthal forces [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This deflection due to magnetic forces is highly dependent on the mechanical properties of the pole pieces themselves and their supporting structure. Furthermore, as the pole pieces deflect, they will experience new magnetic loads which lead to further deflections [20], [31]. Proper assessment of this is likely to require an iterative solution such as [31] and can only be meaningfully undertaken with a full mechanical design.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as the pole pieces deflect, they will experience new magnetic loads which lead to further deflections [20], [31]. Proper assessment of this is likely to require an iterative solution such as [31] and can only be meaningfully undertaken with a full mechanical design. Therefore, for the purpose of this study, the position distributions have also been assumed to be normally distributed with a three-sigma value of 0.4 mm for the radial error and 0.4 deg for the tangential error.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4]. Since then, topologies of flux focusing MG, axial MG, linear MG, transverse MG, interior PM rotor MG, consequent-pole MG [5][6][7][8], etc. have been developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, several modified topologies have been designed for simplifying the mechanical construction [15]. Much more than this, some other machines, including memory machines [16], fault-tolerant machines, consequent-pole machines, double stator machines, and linear machines [17,18] can also be combined with various MGs, thus matching with the low-speed motion and adopting the high-speed Outer radius of MOR core 88.6 mm R 5 Inner radius of MIR core 91.6 mm R 6 Outer radius of MIR core 97.6 mm R 7 Outer radius of PMs on MIR 103.6 mm R 8 Inner radius of FPs 104.4 mm R 9 Outer radius of FPs 116.4 mm R 10 Inner radius of PMs on LR 117.2 mm R 11 Inner radius of LR core 123.7 mm R 12 Outer radius of LR core 130.7 mm L 1 Axial length of PMBM 60 mm L 2 Axial length of MG 40 mm motor/generator design. In Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%