1996
DOI: 10.1007/s004600050018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An iterative method for obtaining accurate atomic inner shell binding energies

Abstract: A new method based on an iterative procedure for obtaining accurate atomic inner shell binding energies is described. The method makes use of the doubly modified Moseley plot as the starting point. As an illustration accurate binding energies for the M shell in the atomic number range 574Z471 have been obtained. This has also resulted in the removal of the anomaly in the M binding energy of Z"68. Our calculations point to a need for a fresh look at the theoretical calculations of inner shell binding energies f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We [6] for the Lα 3 and Lα 4 satellites are also given in the table 1. The self consistent doubly modified Mosley plot procedure developed by Misra et al (1996) [24] being considered to be superior to these methods can not be applied for the calculation of Lα 5 , Lα 6 and Lα 7 satellites as the energy data is only available for three elements Z= 36-38. The energy values shown in table 1 obtained using the above two procedure will not improve significantly after employing self consistent doubly modified Mosley plot procedure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We [6] for the Lα 3 and Lα 4 satellites are also given in the table 1. The self consistent doubly modified Mosley plot procedure developed by Misra et al (1996) [24] being considered to be superior to these methods can not be applied for the calculation of Lα 5 , Lα 6 and Lα 7 satellites as the energy data is only available for three elements Z= 36-38. The energy values shown in table 1 obtained using the above two procedure will not improve significantly after employing self consistent doubly modified Mosley plot procedure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%