2017
DOI: 10.1177/1369433217717118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An iterative order determination method for time-series modeling in structural health monitoring

Abstract: Statistical time-series modeling has recently emerged as a promising and applicable methodology to structural health monitoring. In this methodology, an important step is to choose robust and optimal orders of time-series models for extracting damage-sensitive features. In this study, an iterative order determination method is proposed to determine optimal orders based on residual analysis. The proposed technique consists of identifying the best time-series model, determining the maximum orders, and selecting … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Time series analysis, which uses sequence of data points with uniform time intervals to create systems, can be applied to feature extraction, damage diagnosis, and damage classification without modal parameter identification in SHM [3]. Various time series models, such as AR [7,8,26], ARX (autoregressive model with exogenous input) [27], and ARMA (autoregressive-moving average) [28], have been extensively explored, whose features based on their coefficients have been extracted as damage indices by the SHM community. Das et al [1] conducted a comparative study of the effectiveness of different vibration-based damage identification methods and proved that time series analysis outperformed other methods in damage identification with the presence of operational or environmental nuisances.…”
Section: Damage Identification Under Varying Temperature Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time series analysis, which uses sequence of data points with uniform time intervals to create systems, can be applied to feature extraction, damage diagnosis, and damage classification without modal parameter identification in SHM [3]. Various time series models, such as AR [7,8,26], ARX (autoregressive model with exogenous input) [27], and ARMA (autoregressive-moving average) [28], have been extensively explored, whose features based on their coefficients have been extracted as damage indices by the SHM community. Das et al [1] conducted a comparative study of the effectiveness of different vibration-based damage identification methods and proved that time series analysis outperformed other methods in damage identification with the presence of operational or environmental nuisances.…”
Section: Damage Identification Under Varying Temperature Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To robustly select the order, with an emphasis on extracting uncorrelated residuals, Entezami and Shariatmadar 38 proposed an iterative procedure through the Ljung–Box Q (LBQ) test, assuring model accuracy and adequacy. Rezaiee-Pajand et al 39 also presented a two-stage iterative algorithm, to select the model order on the basis of a residual analysis through statistical hypothesis tests and signal filtering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical decision making refers to the application of statistical methods for the classification of the extracted features. This step is related to the implementation of machine learning algorithms, to classify the structural state conditions and identify possible damage states [5,[14][15][16]. The simple idea of machine learning relies on identifying a relationship between some features derived from the measured data in the undamaged or damaged conditions, as a training data set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%