2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1934-6093.2005.tb00387.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Lmi Approach to Robust H∞ Control for Uncertain Continuous-Time Systems

Abstract: This paper investigates the problems of robust H ∞ control for uncertain continuous-time systems with time-varying, norm-bounded uncertainties in all system matrices. Necessary and sufficient conditions for the above problems are proposed. All conditions are represented in the form of linear matrix inequalities (LMIs). The robust H ∞ controller can be easily designed from the solutions of the LMI conditions. Unlike earlier works, the proposed method does not involve any parameter tuning. Thus the robust H ∞ op… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof: If ẏ(t) is affected by a bounded measurement error n y (1) then w has an increase equal to 1) 2aHn y (1) , 3aHn y (1) , 4aHn y (1) , in cases S2, S6, S9 2) 6a 2 Hn y (1) , 12a 2 Hn y (1) , in cases S3, S7 3) 16a 3 Hn y (1) , in case S4, and γ c has an increase not greater than 1) max 2aHn y (1) , max 3aHn y (1) , max 4aHn y (1) , in cases S2, S6, S9 2) max 6a 2 Hn y (1) , max 12a 2 Hn y (1) , in cases S3, S7 3) max 16a 3 Hn y (1) , in case S4. On the other hand, note that e(t) is 1) inversely proportional to a 2 in case S2, a 3 in case S6, a 4 in case S9;…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Proof: If ẏ(t) is affected by a bounded measurement error n y (1) then w has an increase equal to 1) 2aHn y (1) , 3aHn y (1) , 4aHn y (1) , in cases S2, S6, S9 2) 6a 2 Hn y (1) , 12a 2 Hn y (1) , in cases S3, S7 3) 16a 3 Hn y (1) , in case S4, and γ c has an increase not greater than 1) max 2aHn y (1) , max 3aHn y (1) , max 4aHn y (1) , in cases S2, S6, S9 2) max 6a 2 Hn y (1) , max 12a 2 Hn y (1) , in cases S3, S7 3) max 16a 3 Hn y (1) , in case S4. On the other hand, note that e(t) is 1) inversely proportional to a 2 in case S2, a 3 in case S6, a 4 in case S9;…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Theorem 6: If ẏ(t), ÿ(t), ... y (t) are affected by bounded measurement errors n y (1) , n y (2) , n y (3) , the increase of the tracking error norm e(t) is inversely proportional to a or a 2 or a 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]), including recent ones [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. However, the following practical limitations still remain in effect: (a) the considered classes of systems are often of particular structure; (b) the considered reference signals and disturbances almost always have standard waveforms (polynomial and/or sinusoidal ones); (c) the controllers are not robust enough and/or do not applicable to systems satisfying more than one specification; (d) the control inputs are excessive and/or unfeasible in some cases [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has impulsed a large number of research results obtained on the analysis and synthesis for discrete and continuous-time uncertain system; see, e.g. [10,12,3,8,2,7,9]. Many researchers have extended the obtained results on the robust H ∞ control for delayed systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%