2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2016.08.104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An LQR controller in the obstacle avoidance of a two-wires hammerhead crane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Content may change prior to final publication. Substituting (41) and ( 42) into (33) and making some calculations, we can get By analyzing (29), it is found that there are 8 equality constraints on y 2 (t). We choose a 7-order polynomial function to represent y 2 (t), which is indicated as follows:…”
Section: Trajectory Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Content may change prior to final publication. Substituting (41) and ( 42) into (33) and making some calculations, we can get By analyzing (29), it is found that there are 8 equality constraints on y 2 (t). We choose a 7-order polynomial function to represent y 2 (t), which is indicated as follows:…”
Section: Trajectory Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, some scholars have proposed some novel obstacle avoidance control methods based on crane dynamics. Gutierrez and Joaquin analyzed the crane dynamics and proposed a novel control method which uses a virtual one-wired crane that is equivalent to the new two-wired one [29]. Miyoshi et al present the method that deals with path planning for autonomous overhead cranes considering payload rotation [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underactuated characteristics of the overhead crane make it more difficult to control. At present, some open-loop methods, such as input shaping [1][2][3] and trajectory planning [4,5], and closed-loop methods, such as sliding mode control [6][7][8], linear quadratic regulator (LQR) control [9][10][11], model predictive control [12][13][14], and proportional-integralderivative (PID) control [15][16][17], have been proposed to solve the crane's antisway control problem. The design difficulty mainly lies in how to achieve the control of the swing angle when the input dimension is smaller than the output dimension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 and Hara and Noda 31 focus on developing an assistance system, while no motion planning or motion control method is presented. Gutierrez and Collado 32 study the obstacle-free motion planning of jib cranes, where two avoidance strategies (i.e., load elevation and surrounding obstacle) are considered to design a feasible trajectory first. The linear-quadratic regulator (LQR) controller is then applied to track the design trajectory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%