2021
DOI: 10.3390/d13110586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An MPA Design Approach to Benefit Fisheries: Maximising Larval Export and Minimising Redundancy

Abstract: In the design of marine protected areas (MPAs), tailoring reserve placement to facilitate larval export beyond reserve boundaries may support fished populations and fisheries through recruitment subsidies. Intuitively, capturing such connectivity could be purely based on optimising larval dispersal metrics such as export strength. However, this can lead to inefficient or redundant larval connectivity, as the subset of sites with the best connectivity metrics might share many of the same connections, making the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences suggest that the natural reefs in the ESA may serve as breeding grounds for species of the families Scaridae, Labridae, and Mugilidae, whereas the ARs may serve as breeding grounds for the families Lutjanidae, Synodontidae, Carangidae, Fistularidae, and Haemulidae, which indicates the potential of these novel habitats to expand spawning grounds and fish production in the Espiritu Santo Archipelago. This further contribution of the ARs could benefit adjacent fishing grounds through connectivity via the export of eggs and larvae (recruitment subsidies) [55,56], a phenomenon recorded in other artificial reefs around the world [23,57,58]. In addition, the present study highlights the potential attraction effect of artificial reefs on fish larvae, with special attention being paid to mesopelagic species like Benthosema panamense and pelagic species like Cetengraulis mysticetus and Hemiramphus saltator, which do not tend to naturally reside in reef areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The differences suggest that the natural reefs in the ESA may serve as breeding grounds for species of the families Scaridae, Labridae, and Mugilidae, whereas the ARs may serve as breeding grounds for the families Lutjanidae, Synodontidae, Carangidae, Fistularidae, and Haemulidae, which indicates the potential of these novel habitats to expand spawning grounds and fish production in the Espiritu Santo Archipelago. This further contribution of the ARs could benefit adjacent fishing grounds through connectivity via the export of eggs and larvae (recruitment subsidies) [55,56], a phenomenon recorded in other artificial reefs around the world [23,57,58]. In addition, the present study highlights the potential attraction effect of artificial reefs on fish larvae, with special attention being paid to mesopelagic species like Benthosema panamense and pelagic species like Cetengraulis mysticetus and Hemiramphus saltator, which do not tend to naturally reside in reef areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%