2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00329.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An N-of-1 Trial as an Aid to Decision-Making Prior to Implanting a Permanent Spinal Cord Stimulator

Abstract: We encourage clinicians to perform an N-of-1 trial in every patient before implanting permanent electrodes for SCS.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of a series of n‐of‐1 trials can also be meta‐analyzed to give an estimate of response at a population level [5]. In the treatment of neuropathic pain, although there is a case report of an n‐of‐1 trial of a spinal cord stimulator [6], we have been unable to find any publications describing the use of n‐of‐1 trial methodology for the use of gabapentin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of a series of n‐of‐1 trials can also be meta‐analyzed to give an estimate of response at a population level [5]. In the treatment of neuropathic pain, although there is a case report of an n‐of‐1 trial of a spinal cord stimulator [6], we have been unable to find any publications describing the use of n‐of‐1 trial methodology for the use of gabapentin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single subject research designs have a place in medical research, for example Nof1 trials enable a single participant to undergo periods of comparative treatment (Cepeda et al, 2008;Guyatt et al, 1990). They empower the patient, improve doctor patient communication and increase clinician confidence in treatment options (Guyatt et al, 1990;Nickles et al, 2005).…”
Section: Novel Approaches -An Extended Period Of Descriptive Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In that context, N-of-1 trials should be considered as a means to judge for an individual patient whether a contemplated therapy should be carried out. 87 To ask "does the treatment work?" or to state "it doesn't differ from placebo" are disingenuous when directed toward pain treatments in the abstract, divorced from assessment of individual patients.…”
Section: Moving Beyond Reductionismmentioning
confidence: 99%