1972
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/11.6.293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Objective Clinical Method to Measure Spinal Extension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have been performed among normal individuals with the aim of describing the normal range of spinal movements, and also of identifying factors associated with mobility 5–9 12 13. From these studies, it is known that spinal mobility decreases with age6 8 9 and also that there are some differences in spinal mobility with respect to gender 6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have been performed among normal individuals with the aim of describing the normal range of spinal movements, and also of identifying factors associated with mobility 5–9 12 13. From these studies, it is known that spinal mobility decreases with age6 8 9 and also that there are some differences in spinal mobility with respect to gender 6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a development of this technique, skin distraction was used to assess lateral flexion and a plumb-line to assess extension with good reliability. 30,31 Another widely used method is to measure the distance from the finger-tips to floor during forward bending to measure flexion (of the hips and back combined) or during side bending as a measure of side flexion. This is reliable for flexion, but less satisfactory to measure extension and rotation.…”
Section: Methods Of Measuring the Distance Between Bony Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been modified for increased accuracy by Macrae 101 . Sagittal plane movements are easiest to measure by simple means, but Moll has suggested clinical techniques for measuring the other movements of the spine 102 –105 . Photographic methods have been used by Flint, 106 Davis et al , 107 Loeel, 108 and Troup et al 93 Flint and Davis compared photographic studies with X‐ray studies to determine the differences between the two methods, since many X‐ray studies were being carried out.…”
Section: The Experimental Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%