2022
DOI: 10.1029/2021jd036061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Objective Quality Control of Surface Contamination Observations for ABI Water Vapor Radiance Assimilation

Abstract: A quality control (QC) process which handles surface impacts is an important step toward successful assimilation of the Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) water vapor (WV) band radiances. If the QC is too relaxed, many surface contaminated radiances get assimilated. If the QC is too stringent, useful radiances are rejected. Either way can result in reduced or even compromised observation impacts. A new machine learning‐based QC scheme for the three ABI WV bands is developed and optimized to help understand the imp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that these sample sizes are for the convective candidates that were to be monitored and n via the RF model, rather than convective storm systems in synoptic definition. Inherited from the experience of SWIPEv1, the random forest (RF) algorithm, which is very useful for classification problems [47,48], was adopted as the machine learning framework for the enhanced SWIPEv2. For a detailed description of the RF algorithm, readers are referred to the classic paper on this method [42] and the brief introduction by coauthors of this article in the Appendix of the paper on SWIPEv1 [29].…”
Section: Pv (Potential Vorticity)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that these sample sizes are for the convective candidates that were to be monitored and n via the RF model, rather than convective storm systems in synoptic definition. Inherited from the experience of SWIPEv1, the random forest (RF) algorithm, which is very useful for classification problems [47,48], was adopted as the machine learning framework for the enhanced SWIPEv2. For a detailed description of the RF algorithm, readers are referred to the classic paper on this method [42] and the brief introduction by coauthors of this article in the Appendix of the paper on SWIPEv1 [29].…”
Section: Pv (Potential Vorticity)mentioning
confidence: 99%