2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2017.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Observational Study of 3 Different Transfusion Medicine Teaching Methods for Medical Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Novice learners benefit from small group discussions as they provide opportunities for learners to recognise important factors and cues, connect knowledge and assess and analyse their own understanding [23]. However, this research shows a potential limitation to learning NTS is “groupthink”.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Novice learners benefit from small group discussions as they provide opportunities for learners to recognise important factors and cues, connect knowledge and assess and analyse their own understanding [23]. However, this research shows a potential limitation to learning NTS is “groupthink”.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(25) Teaching based on specific skills applied to clinical cases favors student learning. (26) A Brazilian study assessed knowledge of sixth-year undergraduate medical students and residents of several areas. The transfusion adequacy was 35% and 49.5%, respectively.…”
Section: ❚ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 25 ) O ensino baseado em competências específicas aplicadas em casos clínicos favorece o aprendizado do aluno. ( 26 ) Estudo brasileiro avaliou o conhecimento de alunos do sexto ano do curso de medicina e residentes de diversas áreas. A adequação transfusional foi de 35% e 49,5%, respectivamente.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Simulation allows learners to experience highly interactive transfusion scenarios in a mock environment with the opportunity for immediate feedback after the activity. Konia and colleagues analyzed the use of high‐fidelity simulation delivered in‐person or online or using a hybrid of both methods. Medical students in all three arms had improvements in their posttest scores compared to pretest values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%