An observational study on IAPT waiting times before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic using descriptive time-series data

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore waiting times in improving access to psychological therapies (IAPT) services before and throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. The paper aims to help develop a better understanding of waiting times in IAPT so that interventions can be developed to address them. Design/methodology/approach IAPT national data reports was analysed to determine access and in-treatment waiting times before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Time-series data was used to examine referral patterns, waiting list size and waiting times between the period of November 2018 and January 2022. The data covers all regions in England where an IAPT service has been commissioned. Findings There was a dramatic drop in referrals to IAPT services when lockdown started. Waiting list size for all IAPT services in the country reduced, as did incomplete and completed waits. The reduction in waiting times was short-lived, and longer waits are returning. Practical implications This paper aims to contribute to the literature on IAPT waiting times both in relation to, and outside of, COVID-19. It is hoped that the conclusions will generate discussion about addressing long waits to treatment for psychological therapy and encourage further research. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there is no published research examining the performance of IAPT waiting times to second appointment. The paper also contributes to an understanding of how IAPT waiting times are measured and explores challenges with the system itself. Finally, it offers an overview on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on waiting time performance nationally.

Conversational AI facilitates mental health assessments and is associated with improved recovery rates

“…For example, in England’s National Health Service (NHS) in 2020, 50% of patients waited over 28 days between assessment and their first treatment session (NHS Digital, 2020). This is in stark contrast to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) treatment guidelines that highlight a swift treatment as a key to recovery 9…”

Using Conversational AI to Facilitate Mental Health Assessments and Improve Clinical Efficiency Within Psychotherapy Services: Real-World Observational Study

“…For instance, in the English National Health Service (NHS), between 2021 and 2022, 31% of referrals to Talking Therapy services dropped off the wait list before starting treatment, and 9% of patients waited for >6 weeks for their clinical assessment [ 11 ]. In addition, a further 47% of patients experienced hidden waits of >28 days between clinical assessment and their first treatment session, contrary to the guidance from the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence, which highlights the importance of timely access to treatment [ 12 ].…”

“I thought it would just be, like, older men in white coats”: A qualitative exploration of first encounters with mental health services

“…However, this is not unique to Ireland—in several countries, including the UK (Crouch et al, 2019; Punton et al, 2022), Australia (Pienkos & Bush, 2022; Trankle & Reath, 2019), and Canada (Duncan et al, 2022; Gaspar et al, 2021), service users have identified similar barriers to timely access to appropriate professional mental health supports. Of note, Larsson et al (2022) and Molodynski et al (2021) have highlighted that prolonged service access has been even further impacted in light of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Early intervention is key in ensuring more positive outcomes for those experiencing mental distress (Vusio et al, 2021).…”