2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12070-020-02180-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Observational Study to Compare Prevalence and Demography of Sensorineural Hearing Loss Among Military Personnel and Civilian Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite this, the classification accuracy of the majority of the currently proposed solutions ranges between 90 and 95%, which, while very high, still leaves substantial room for error. According to clinical standards, the margin of error should be kept under 5% 24 and ideally should be close to 3% 25 . Only one of the discussed classifiers satisfies these requirements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this, the classification accuracy of the majority of the currently proposed solutions ranges between 90 and 95%, which, while very high, still leaves substantial room for error. According to clinical standards, the margin of error should be kept under 5% 24 and ideally should be close to 3% 25 . Only one of the discussed classifiers satisfies these requirements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This being said, however, the currently proposed solutions deliver classification accuracy in the 90-95% range, which, although very high, still leaves considerable room for error. Clinical standards suggest that the margin of error should be kept under 5% [16] and optimally should be close to 3% [17]. These requirements are met only by two of the discussed classifiers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%