“…Models of ionospheric response to geomagnetic storms rely directly on the quality of available data; problems in the data carry straight into these models including biases and larger uncertainty due to erroneous, repeated, and missing observations. To be more specific, the scientific community has used the World Data Center ionospheric database to support innovative research, including studies of both short-and long-term processes (e.g., Araujo-Pradere et al, 2004;Araujo-Pradere et al, 2005;Jarvis et al, 2002;Marin et al, 2001), as well as case studies of individual disturbances, that is, plasma bubble descriptions (Shiokawa et al, 2015), and traveling ionospheric disturbances (Lin et al, 2017), ionospheric response during extreme conditions (Burešová & Laštovička, 2017;Habarulema et al, 2017), and modeling of various purposes (Hernández-Pajares et al, 2017;Liu et al, 2017). Because issues with the quality of the data can substantially affect the outcome of the analyses, feedback from users that are conducting original research based on the data is one of the best ways to detect and possibly correct these issues to decrease their prevalence in the data record.…”