2018
DOI: 10.1134/s1054661818020086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Obstacle Detection Method for Visually Impaired Persons by Ground Plane Removal Using Speeded-Up Robust Features and Gray Level Co-Occurrence Matrix

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jindal et al [27] have designed a novel smartphone-based cost-effective system for safe walking along the roads by observing the obstacles along the paths of the visually impaired people in real-time scenarios. The video was captured with the aid of the Monocular vision approach and they have extracted the frames from the video by the meaning of neglecting the blurriness that occurred in the image due to the camera motion.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jindal et al [27] have designed a novel smartphone-based cost-effective system for safe walking along the roads by observing the obstacles along the paths of the visually impaired people in real-time scenarios. The video was captured with the aid of the Monocular vision approach and they have extracted the frames from the video by the meaning of neglecting the blurriness that occurred in the image due to the camera motion.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some are designed for specific applications (e.g., obstacles on the road for vehicle collision avoidance), others fuse multiple sensor modalities (which requires much more data and processing time), and yet others employ neural networks trained on specific types of obstacles. For example, two widely used methods, gray-level co-occurrence matrices (Jindal, Aggarwal, and Gupta 2018) and k-mean clustering (Kanungo et al 2002), proved to be far too computationally or logistically complex for the intended application. In addition, none of these methods quantify a degree of assurance that the detected anomaly is actually present as opposed to being a natural part of the scene.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reference image that its distance to the input image is smaller than the threshold is acceptable. Such ANN algorithms terminate when an acceptable reference image is found and decide that the class of the input image is same as the class of this 9 Directed Enumeration Method 10 Histogram of Oriented Gradients acceptable reference image. So the termination condition for these algorithms can be formulated as follows [3]:…”
Section: Ml-ann Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] In face recognition and generally image recognition problems, this process is more challenging due to the effect of lighting and complex background variability [5] and also variability of objects presented in images [4]. There are many ways for feature extraction such as "SIFT 1 " [6] which was applied in [7], "SURF 2 " [8] applied in [9], and "HOG 3 " [10] applied in [11].Based on the application, we can decide which one to use. After extracting the feature of all images, it is time to use machine learning algorithms [3] to classify the input image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%