2019 IEEE 44th Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/lcn44214.2019.8990831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Odd Couple: Loss-Based Congestion Control and Minimum RTT Scheduling in MPTCP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The induced packet losses in Scenario #1 caused LIA to slow down the sending rate. Moreover, the aggressive fairness algorithm of LIA caused the throughput being suppressed further and resulted in poor performance [11]. The same cause applied to OLIA and BALIA as well.…”
Section: A Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The induced packet losses in Scenario #1 caused LIA to slow down the sending rate. Moreover, the aggressive fairness algorithm of LIA caused the throughput being suppressed further and resulted in poor performance [11]. The same cause applied to OLIA and BALIA as well.…”
Section: A Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This indicated that C-MPBBR and other BBR-based MPTCP variants could efficiently utilize and share the underlying network, in contrast with LIA, OLIA, and BALIA. According to [11], we consider the cause to be an aggressive fairness ensuring mechanism used in LIA, OLIA, and BALIA. This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited.…”
Section: A Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…LIA could successfully shift the traffic from a congested path to a less congested path while improving throughput and fairness. However, LIA fails to fully utilize the underlying network due to its insistence on fairness [37].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wei et al [20] introduced a shared bottleneck-based congestion control mechanism for MPTCP in order to mitigate the outof-order packet arrival problem, by detecting the shared bottlenecks and estimating the congestion level of each MPTCP subflow. Lĺźbben et al [21] discussed the complex behaviors of MPTCP caused by the interaction of the loss-based congestion control and minimum Round-Trip Time (RTT) scheduling and then proposed several alternative congestion control algorithms for MPTCP as the corresponding countermeasure. Ferlin et al [22] designed a practical shared bottleneck detection (PSBD)-based congestion control mechanism for MPTCP in order to make MPTCP flows remain fair to the TCP flows in a shared bottleneck scenario.…”
Section: B Mptcp Congestion Control and Fairness Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%