2020
DOI: 10.4274/tjcd.galenos.2020.2020-1-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Old Method Turnbull Cutait; Using for Middle and Distal Rectal Cancer Surgery without Ileostomy. Oncological and Fuctional Late Outcomes

Abstract: Aim: Anastomotic leak after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer may be a disaster scenario. To reduce the severity of anastomotic leakage a prophylactic diverting ileostomy is usually used for mid or distal rectal cancer patients. However, Turnbull Cutait Abdominoperineal Pull-Through Procedure (T-C) with low anastomotic leakage rates is an old method that is applied without diverting ileostomy. We aimed to evaluate the long-term functional and oncological results of the T-C procedure performed in p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same authors published a retrospective study about long-term oncological and functional outcomes of 13 patients with rectal cancer reconstructed using the TCA technique after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and reported a 5-year survival rate of 85%, very similar to that reported in our study, with a 90% OS and 80.1% DFS at 5 years. 25 Regarding the functionality outcomes, 3 patients required permanent stoma (23%), which is in line with our results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The same authors published a retrospective study about long-term oncological and functional outcomes of 13 patients with rectal cancer reconstructed using the TCA technique after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and reported a 5-year survival rate of 85%, very similar to that reported in our study, with a 90% OS and 80.1% DFS at 5 years. 25 Regarding the functionality outcomes, 3 patients required permanent stoma (23%), which is in line with our results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…26 Regarding functional outcomes, three patients required permanent stoma (two patients due to severe rectal evacuation problem and one patient due to anastomotic stenosis), and 90% of patients had satisfactory gas and faecal continence at the end of 2 years. 26 The T-C technique has also been used as a salvage procedure in several studies with encouraging results; thus, it may have a place in the management of such difficult clinical cases as well. 7,8,27 Theoretical explanations for low rates of anastomotic leakage and pelvic septic complications in patients undergoing the T-C technique include the initially insignificant effect of the retraction on the pulled-through colonic segment due to contracted pelvic diaphragm at the termination of surgery as there is no anastomosis as well as by the prevention of the retraction of the colonic segments due to adhesions forming between the exteriorized colonic segment and anus during the waiting period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A study examining the long‐term oncological and functional outcomes of 13 middle and distal rectal cancer patients operated with the T–C technique following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy reported the 5‐year survival rate of 85% and no local recurrence during a mean follow‐up of 101.2 months 26 . Regarding functional outcomes, three patients required permanent stoma (two patients due to severe rectal evacuation problem and one patient due to anastomotic stenosis), and 90% of patients had satisfactory gas and faecal continence at the end of 2 years 26 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%