2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.05.31.446433
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An olfactory pattern generator for on-demand combinatorial control of receptor activities

Abstract: Olfactory systems employ combinatorial receptor codes for odors. Systematically generating stimuli that address the combinatorial possibilities of an olfactory code poses unique challenges. Here, we present a stimulus method to probe the combinatorial code, demonstrated using the Drosophila larva. This method leverages a set of primary odorants, each of which targets the activity of one olfactory receptor neuron (ORN) type at an optimal concentration. Our setup uses microfluidics to mix any combination of prim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it innervates ~30 glomeruli, presenting a male fly specifically activates the arbors in the DA1 glomerulus (Figure 4G, H). This suggests that its tortuous branching allows it to act in a compartmentalized fashion, reminiscent of recent studies in larval Drosophila (Si et al, 2021) and the adult visual system (Meier and Borst, 2019). One might think that mixing olfactory signals from both antennae would make it harder to extract positional information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Although it innervates ~30 glomeruli, presenting a male fly specifically activates the arbors in the DA1 glomerulus (Figure 4G, H). This suggests that its tortuous branching allows it to act in a compartmentalized fashion, reminiscent of recent studies in larval Drosophila (Si et al, 2021) and the adult visual system (Meier and Borst, 2019). One might think that mixing olfactory signals from both antennae would make it harder to extract positional information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%