2011
DOI: 10.1007/s12541-011-0143-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An on-machine and vision-based depth-error measurement method for micro machine tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the direct monitoring method, the output variable is directly measured on the surface of the workpiece. It mainly obtains data through machine vision or digital image processing technology [11], such as flank wear width in one dimensional (VB) [12][13][14], wear area in two dimensional [15,16] and wear volume in three dimensional [17] (Figure 1a-c). The main advantage of the direct monitoring method is that there is no interaction between the measurement system and the measured surface and does not affect the stiffness of the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the direct monitoring method, the output variable is directly measured on the surface of the workpiece. It mainly obtains data through machine vision or digital image processing technology [11], such as flank wear width in one dimensional (VB) [12][13][14], wear area in two dimensional [15,16] and wear volume in three dimensional [17] (Figure 1a-c). The main advantage of the direct monitoring method is that there is no interaction between the measurement system and the measured surface and does not affect the stiffness of the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the direct monitoring method, the output variable is directly measured on the surface of the workpiece. It mainly obtains data through machine vision or digital image processing technology [11], such as flank wear width in one dimensional (VB) [12][13][14], wear area in two dimensional [15,16] and wear volume in three dimensional [17] (Figure 1a-c). The main advantage of the direct monitoring method is that there is no interaction between the measurement system and the measured surface and does not affect the stiffness of the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jurkovic et al [10], Dai and Zhu [11] used vision systems to measure tool wear in turning and micro-milling, respectively. Moreover, Wang et al [12] proposed a method based on MV for detecting the depth dimension error of a part cavity. Based on the edge extraction method, Kavitha and Ashok [13] analyzed the radial runout of the lathe spindle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%