2018
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.25538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ONIOM investigation of the effect of conformation on bond dissociation energies in peptides

Abstract: In the present study, we use the ONIOM strategy of Morokuma and coworkers to examine the various CH bond dissociation energies (BDEs) of a small peptide (2ONW) and compare these with values obtained for its component individual amino acid residues. To evaluate suitable methods for ONIOM‐based geometry optimizations, we test an “internal consistency” approach against full B3‐LYP//B3‐LYP results, and find B3‐LYP/6‐31G(d):AM1 to be appropriate. We find that the BDEs at the α‐carbon in 2ONW are generally larger t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We previously found MS1-D3 to be reasonable for geometry optimizations; in addition, the energetic consequences of using geometries optimized with different functionals are not excessive. We also determined that the DSD-PBEP86 DH-DFT method is highly accurate for obtaining conformational energies of similar systems. , In passing, we note that the related revDSD-PBEP86 method yields results that are generally comparable to or somewhat better than those for DSD-PBEP86, which we also found in some other cases . Nonetheless, herein we use the DSD-PBEP86//MS1-D3 relative energies on the basis of our initial assessment of closely related systems.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…We previously found MS1-D3 to be reasonable for geometry optimizations; in addition, the energetic consequences of using geometries optimized with different functionals are not excessive. We also determined that the DSD-PBEP86 DH-DFT method is highly accurate for obtaining conformational energies of similar systems. , In passing, we note that the related revDSD-PBEP86 method yields results that are generally comparable to or somewhat better than those for DSD-PBEP86, which we also found in some other cases . Nonetheless, herein we use the DSD-PBEP86//MS1-D3 relative energies on the basis of our initial assessment of closely related systems.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…We have used a random subset of conformers to examine the use of several methods for geometry optimization. Our benchmark geometries were obtained in the gas phase at the B3-LYP-D3BJ/maug-cc-pVTZ level. In our previous studies, we find that the energetic consequences of using geometries optimized with different functionals are not excessive. , The lower level methods that we have examined include B3-LYP-D3BJ with a variety of smaller basis sets, the N12 nonhybrid DFT method with the 6-31G­(d) basis set, the AM1 and PM7 semiempirical methods, and the MM2 and MMFF molecular mechanics methods. Our assessment involves comparing single-point energies obtained with benchmark geometries with those obtained using lower level structures.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because no significant deviation from the X-ray structure was observed in the dynamics simulation with the exception of thermal fluctuation, the PRS snapshots closest to the transition state obtained by the theozyme models were extracted from the AMBER formula for the grid inhomogeneous solvation theory (GIST) as the starting geometries in the ONIOM calculations. At first, the whole structure from the NPT ensemble was partially truncated so that only the catalytic center with the 6 Å neighborhood of core residues, E136, Y46, and H102, were preoptimized at the empirical-molecular mechanics level (PM7) with the constraint of partially formed C–O bonds for fast screening spiro- and fused-transition states . The calculated fused- S and spiro- R systems included 84 atoms for the high layer and respectively 4113 and 4109 atoms for the low layer, and among them 1591 and 1574 atoms within the fully optimized 6 Å active pocket range.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At first, the whole structure from the NPT ensemble was partially truncated so that only the catalytic center with the 6 Å neighborhood of core residues, E136, Y46, and H102, were preoptimized at the empirical-molecular mechanics level (PM7) with the constraint of partially formed C−O bonds for fast screening spiro-and fused-transition states. 43 The calculated fused-S and spiro-R systems included 84 atoms for the high layer and respectively 4113 and 4109 atoms for the low layer, and among them 1591 and 1574 atoms within the fully optimized 6 Å active pocket range. The transition structures then were fully optimized with high-level QM methods with the ωB97X-D functional 26 and standard Pople style 6-31+G(d) basis sets for the QM region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%