2013
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt1326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An online bioinformatics tool predicts zinc finger and TALE nuclease off-target cleavage

Abstract: Although engineered nucleases can efficiently cleave intracellular DNA at desired target sites, major concerns remain on potential ‘off-target’ cleavage that may occur throughout the genome. We developed an online tool: predicted report of genome-wide nuclease off-target sites (PROGNOS) that effectively identifies off-target sites. The initial bioinformatics algorithms in PROGNOS were validated by predicting 44 of 65 previously confirmed off-target sites, and by uncovering a new off-target site for the extensi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
118
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
118
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…target TALE binding and TALEN activity (Hockemeyer et al 2011;Osborn et al 2013;Fine et al 2014;Guilinger et al 2014). Notably, both technologies showed similar exceptional levels of specificity of gene activation by RNA-seq ( Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…target TALE binding and TALEN activity (Hockemeyer et al 2011;Osborn et al 2013;Fine et al 2014;Guilinger et al 2014). Notably, both technologies showed similar exceptional levels of specificity of gene activation by RNA-seq ( Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Previous studies of the specificity of TALEand CRISPR/Cas9-based genome engineering technologies have largely relied on predictive methods, using bioinformatic algorithms (Hockemeyer et al 2011;Fu et al 2013;Hsu et al 2013;Cho et al 2014;Fine et al 2014), assays of purified protein activity in vitro (Pattanayak et al 2013;Guilinger et al 2014), and/or reporter assays (Mali et al 2013a) to inform the selection of off-target sites for direct interrogation. Recently developed methods for unbiased genome-wide specificity analysis are dependent on nuclease activity and therefore cannot directly assess the specificity of gene regulation tools (Frock et al 2015;Kim et al 2015;Tsai et al 2015;Wang et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To test for potential nonspecific mutations induced by the introduction of the TALENs, we studied 22 potential off-target loci of TALEN pairs (Table S2), predicted using a bioinformatics-based approach, the ranking algorithm PROGNOS (22). All of the potential off-target sites were located in intron and intergenic regions; 21 out of the 22 consisted of inverted repeats of the right TALEN target sites, making these sites vulnerable to cleavage by the wild-type Fok1 homodimer (23).…”
Section: Pluripotency Of Genetically Modified Homozygous Ccr5δ32 Ipscmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trials to establish controlled artificial nucleases through lightactivation [62,63], DNA binding [64], cold-shock technique [65], protein-protein interaction [66], DNA modification [67] or metal ion dependent DNA binding [68] were also executed. Bioinformatics was utilized to predict ZFN and TALEN off-target cleavage [69].…”
Section: Current Artificial Nucleasesmentioning
confidence: 99%