2005
DOI: 10.1080/00207170500228483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An online genetic algorithm based model predictive control autopilot design with experimental verification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Controlling underactuated vehicles is especially challenging because they are not fully feedback linearizable and show nonholonomic constraints, so standard tools to control nonlinear systems-such as feedback linearization and integrator backstepping-may cause poor performance (Aguiar and Hespanha 2003). Currently, the applied control schemes vary from rudimentary proportional-derivative designs (Fossen 1994) over fuzzy control (Vaneck 1997;Gyoungwoo et al 2009), linear quadratic Gaussian control (Naeem et al 2008) to nonlinear control theories such as sliding-mode (Ashrafiuon et al 2008) and model predictive control (MPC) (Naeem et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Controlling underactuated vehicles is especially challenging because they are not fully feedback linearizable and show nonholonomic constraints, so standard tools to control nonlinear systems-such as feedback linearization and integrator backstepping-may cause poor performance (Aguiar and Hespanha 2003). Currently, the applied control schemes vary from rudimentary proportional-derivative designs (Fossen 1994) over fuzzy control (Vaneck 1997;Gyoungwoo et al 2009), linear quadratic Gaussian control (Naeem et al 2008) to nonlinear control theories such as sliding-mode (Ashrafiuon et al 2008) and model predictive control (MPC) (Naeem et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…H p is the prediction horizon or output horizon, and H c the control horizon. More details can be found in Naeem et al (2005). For completeness, the general structure of an MPC is shown in Figure 4(a).…”
Section: A Ro Bu S T Nav I G At I O N T E C H N I Qu E F O R G U I Damentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concepts and techniques of MPC have been developed over the past three decades (Annamalai, 2012), and various authors such as Maciejowski (2002), Rawlings andMayne (2009), Wang (2009) and Allgower et al (2010) suggest that MPC is widely used in the process and petrochemical industries. In addition, the marine control system design fraternity has also embraced this approach since it offers the advantage of being capable of enforcing various types of constraints on the plant process as exemplified by Naeem et al (2005), Perez (2005), Oh and Sun (2005), Liu et al, (2011) and Li and Sun (2012). In general, the plant output is predicted by using a model of the plant to be controlled.…”
Section: A Ro Bu S T Nav I G At I O N T E C H N I Qu E F O R G U I Damentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These chromosomes are the encoded representations of all the parameters of the solution. Each chromosomes is compared to other chromosomes in the population and awarded fitness rating that indicates how successful this chromosomes to the latter [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. There are three main stages of a genetic algorithm, these are known as reproduction, crossover and mutation [8].…”
Section: Genetic Algorithm (Ga)mentioning
confidence: 99%