2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An online method for estimating grazing and rumination bouts using acoustic signals in grazing cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(i) a signal conditioning stage, which attenuates the effects of environmental noises and disturbances, (ii) a set of extracted acoustical features and (iii) a machine learning model that provides the algorithm with excellent discrimination capabilities. Based on this algorithm, a foraging activity recognizer called BUFAR was proposed by Chelotti et al (2020). It analyses groups of JM to recognize grazing and rumination bouts.…”
Section: Background: Current Acoustic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(i) a signal conditioning stage, which attenuates the effects of environmental noises and disturbances, (ii) a set of extracted acoustical features and (iii) a machine learning model that provides the algorithm with excellent discrimination capabilities. Based on this algorithm, a foraging activity recognizer called BUFAR was proposed by Chelotti et al (2020). It analyses groups of JM to recognize grazing and rumination bouts.…”
Section: Background: Current Acoustic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main disadvantage of this algorithm is the requirement of the entire sound record to achieve satisfactory performance results. More recently, Chelotti et al (2020) introduced BUFAR, an alternative algorithm to RAFAR to enable on-line processing of sound signals. Both, RAFAR and BUFAR achieved better performance compared to commercial rumination collars (Chelotti et al, 2020;Vanrell et al, 2018), yet the two also showed a noticeable misclassifications between grazing and rumination bouts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Röttgen et al [ 134 ] reported that the vocalisation rate is a suitable indicator used to confirm a cattle’s estrus status, and it was suggested that the status of the cattle can be monitored through voice analysis. Chelotti et al [ 135 ] estimated grazing and rumination bouts using acoustic signals in grazing cattle and achieved 0.75 F1-scores for both activities. However, how to effectively acquire sound and to accurately determine this information in a livestock facility is still a challenge.…”
Section: Cattle Lameness Detection and Scoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clapham et al [26] used manual identification and sound metrics to identify the jaw movement that detected 95% of behavior, however this system requires manual calibration periodically which is not recommended for automated learning systems. Furthermore, some systems use sound sensors to recognize the rumination and grazing behavior after analysing jaw movement [27,28]. The monitoring methods with sound sensor gave a good performance.…”
Section: Sound Sensor For Rumination Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%