An online review of informational sources for advanced or high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma

Abstract

Objective Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is one of the most prevalent non-melanoma skin cancers worldwide. While usually treatable, patients with high-risk or advanced disease have few treatment options and limited resources available. This review assesses what online information resources are available to patients and their families about either high-risk or advanced cSCC. Methods Searches were run, via Google, using 8 terms such as ‘advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma patient information’. Advertisements were removed and the first 3 pages/30 results from each search were screened for duplicates and then against eligibility criteria. Websites needed to have been updated within the past 5 years, be freely accessible, designed specifically for patients and refer to the advanced disease or high-risk setting. Remaining results were assessed using the DISCERN tool. Results Of the final 240 results, 121 were duplicates and 104 were ineligible. The remaining 15 sources were predominantly aimed at American audiences, used variable terminology and revealed differing treatment pathways. Only 3 sites were deemed as ‘high’-quality information sources. Conclusion There is a lack of accessible online information on high-risk or advanced cSCC for patients. What is available is often too scientific or clinical and lacks clarity about the disease and treatment options. Practice Implications Further work is needed to improve the integrity and accessibility of online sources and to signpost patients to the most reliable information. This should include elements of patient led research, clinical education and information development.

Are YouTube videos on cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma a useful and reliable source for patients?

“…These are surprisingly few videos compared to previous studies identifying 49 informational resources on melanoma [3] and 41 on BCC [4]. Nevertheless, similarly low numbers of informational resources were found in a recent search for English websites on advanced or high-risk cSCC [14]. One possible explanation for the low number of eligible cSCC videos could be that this tumor entity is less common than BCC and is therefore addressed less frequently.…”

Patient education information material assessment criteria: A scoping review

“…J. Patel et al, 2021;S. K. Patel et al, 2015;Patel & Cobourne, 2011;Raeis, 2006;Rai et al, 2021;Redfern et al, 2006;Richard et al, 2007;Roberts, 2006;Robins et al, 2016;Rofaiel & Chande, 2018;Ronfeldt et al, 2018;Rothrock et al, 2019;Roughead et al, 2016;Saeed & Anderson, 2017;Schairer et al, 2017;Schoberer et al, 2015;Schwarzbach et al, 2021;Shah et al, 2013;Shao et al, 2020;Shetty et al, 2020;Starkings et al, 2021;Strauss et al, 2020;Sullivan et al, 2014;Taki et al, 2015;Tan et al, 2009;Taylor-Clarke et al, 2012;Tbalvandany et al, 2018;Tirlapur et al, 2013;Townsend, 2011;Tran & Tsui, 2021;Treffalls et al, 2022;van Ballegooie & Hoang, 2021;Van Biesen et al, 2013;Vargas et al, 2017;Venosa et al, 2021;Vicente-Neira et al, 2022;Wang et al, 2017;Wasserman et al, 2014;P. White et al, 2004;R.…”