2010 14th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference 2010
DOI: 10.1109/edoc.2010.32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Ontology-Based Approach for Semantic Integration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the differences in the works's goals, some techniques and solutions proposed by Calhau and Falbo [2] can be very usefull for our research, such as the use of conceptual models for each tool and the corresponding mapping with an SCM ontology. Another similarity between our work and this related work is the use of the SCM ontology proposed by Arantes et al [4] as a reference ontology in the SCM domain.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite the differences in the works's goals, some techniques and solutions proposed by Calhau and Falbo [2] can be very usefull for our research, such as the use of conceptual models for each tool and the corresponding mapping with an SCM ontology. Another similarity between our work and this related work is the use of the SCM ontology proposed by Arantes et al [4] as a reference ontology in the SCM domain.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integration problem between tools was also addressed by Calhau and Falbo [2], [24] who proposed an OntologyBased Approach for Semantic Integration aiming to achieve a semantic agreement between computational tools used in requirements analysis and modeling phases. The proposed approach deals with integration in three layers: data, service, and process.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Not using a systematic approach for performing the integration, despite the existence of systematic approaches in the literature (e.g. [24], [25], [26]), can be seen as a gap regarding methodological aspects. Systematic approaches can structure the integration process into different levels of abstractions and define guidelines on how to perform the various integration activities.…”
Section: All Proposals Support Data Collection and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neglecting semantics during an integration initiative is a serious issue, since many semantic problems can occur, such as the ones called "false agreement", which are described in [28] and include: the use of equivalent terms with different meaning; the use of equivalent terms with partially equivalent meaning; the use of different terms with equivalent meaning; and the use of different terms with a certain degree of equivalence. For addressing these problems, ontologies can be used to establish a common conceptualization about the domain in order to support communication and tools integration [24].…”
Section: All Proposals Support Data Collection and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%