2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Ontology-Based, Mobile-Optimized System for Pharmacogenomic Decision Support at the Point-of-Care

Abstract: BackgroundThe development of genotyping and genetic sequencing techniques and their evolution towards low costs and quick turnaround have encouraged a wide range of applications. One of the most promising applications is pharmacogenomics, where genetic profiles are used to predict the most suitable drugs and drug dosages for the individual patient. This approach aims to ensure appropriate medical treatment and avoid, or properly manage, undesired side effects.ResultsWe developed the Medicine Safety Code (MSC) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7476 Currently, heterogeneity among genomic variation databases and among health care record systems, coupled with lack of common ontology for genomic test results and interpretations, limit interoperability and are hindering the use of pharmacogenetic test results longitudinally as well as across all of the health care systems each patient must navigate. Several groups are working to standardize pharmacogenetic test terminologies, 77–82 with an eye toward creating terminology that can drive CDS across health care record systems. Initiatives such as the Institute of Medicine Roundtable on Translating Genomic-Based Research for Health and CPIC are working to create terms and language that can be directly uploaded into electronic health care records’ CDS, but heterogeneity across systems will at least initially slow creation and uptake of CDS to facilitate use of pharmacogenetic information.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7476 Currently, heterogeneity among genomic variation databases and among health care record systems, coupled with lack of common ontology for genomic test results and interpretations, limit interoperability and are hindering the use of pharmacogenetic test results longitudinally as well as across all of the health care systems each patient must navigate. Several groups are working to standardize pharmacogenetic test terminologies, 77–82 with an eye toward creating terminology that can drive CDS across health care record systems. Initiatives such as the Institute of Medicine Roundtable on Translating Genomic-Based Research for Health and CPIC are working to create terms and language that can be directly uploaded into electronic health care records’ CDS, but heterogeneity across systems will at least initially slow creation and uptake of CDS to facilitate use of pharmacogenetic information.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These reports were either generated as HTML pages [10, 18, 22, 30, 34] or as PDF documents [32, 34]. The reports are presented to the physician either in the local EHR - if the pharmacogenomic CDSS was integrated into the EHR - or in an online portal - if they are not integrated into the EHR.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pharmacogenomic information is usually gathered within the environment of a particular clinic or health care provider. Via patient letters [18, 31, 39, 42] and online portals [25], which contain the pharmacogenomic test results, this information can be transferred to other health care providers. For instance, patients can be advised to discuss their pharmacogenomic test results with physicians whenever a medication is prescribed which is affected by these pharmacogenomic results [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third best paper is authored by Miñarro-Giménez et al [13]. It is a remarkable work first because it is an attempt to actually take into account pharmacogenomics data for clinical decision support and personalized medicine at large, and second because it implements an innovative combination of latest information technologies.…”
Section: Computerized Clinical Decision Support: Contributions From 2014mentioning
confidence: 99%