2013 IEEE 8th International Conference on Global Software Engineering 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icgse.2013.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Ontology for Task Allocation to Teams in Distributed Software Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Marques presents a domain ontology to represent concepts related to task allocation in distributed teams in his paper. This method deals with the lack of standardized vocabulary and achieve knowledge acquisition and sharing [23].…”
Section: B Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Marques presents a domain ontology to represent concepts related to task allocation in distributed teams in his paper. This method deals with the lack of standardized vocabulary and achieve knowledge acquisition and sharing [23].…”
Section: B Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The successful allocation rate of the expansion matrix method decreases when the number of tasks increases It shows that RHA can effectively allocate tasks to development sites with the lowest cost when the number of tasks changes. In this section, we briefly review the existing task assignment methods [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] in global software distribution.…”
Section: B Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We identified three taxonomies (Gumm 2006;Laurent et al 2010;Šmite et al 2014) and two ontologies (Vizcaíno et al 2012;Marques et al 2013) that provide knowledge organization schemes in the GSE context. It is important to note that other taxonomies were also identified (Ågerfalk and Fitzgerald 2008;Robinson and Kalakota 2010;Hofner et al 2011), but they were already used as basis for Smite et al 's taxonomy (Šmite et al 2014).…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Description approach: Three studies (Laurent et al 2010;Vizcaíno et al 2012;Marques et al 2013) proposed graphical-based approaches that are more adequate to describe rather than to classify GSE projects. It comes from the fact that none of these approaches has dimensions with clear classification criteria associated to them; rather, they provide a set of "variables" that should be instantiated.…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation