(ISATP 2005). The 6th IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning: From Nano to Macro Assembly and Manufacturing
DOI: 10.1109/isatp.2005.1511480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ontology for the definition and validation of assembly processes for evolvable assembly systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this purpose, starting from the actual user requirement specifications (overall project requirements and product model) a Process-oriented ontology has been developed within the EPS domain. This ontology has the aims to describe and guide the assembly process specification both for new assembly system configuration and for reconfiguration of existing assembly systems [8]. One of the most relevant consequences of this ontological representation is that the conceptual and physical links between the product's features and the actual manufacturing system will be evident since the first stages of a new project.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this purpose, starting from the actual user requirement specifications (overall project requirements and product model) a Process-oriented ontology has been developed within the EPS domain. This ontology has the aims to describe and guide the assembly process specification both for new assembly system configuration and for reconfiguration of existing assembly systems [8]. One of the most relevant consequences of this ontological representation is that the conceptual and physical links between the product's features and the actual manufacturing system will be evident since the first stages of a new project.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the answers to the needs listed above comes from the Evolvable Paradigm (Onori [5], Barata e al [6]) which has, since his appearance, been declined in many different fields. Major efforts in this direction has been done during the EUPASS project (included in the European Community 6 th framework programme) where a common architecture [7] along with a system setting methodology [4] have been developed and where an Ontolology for the representation of domain knowledge [8] and agentified control solutions [9] have been provided. As it is better detailed in the next paragraphs all these achievements lead to an innovative concept of manufacturing system which hardly fits in the traditional , rigid and well established way to approach the business nowadays.…”
Section: Introduction and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach allows a dynamic integration of new activity types and can also be used as basis for the functional synthesis of newly configured equipment solutions. More detail on the decomposition process can be found in Lohse et al (2005a).…”
Section: Process Decomposition Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, an object is any entity that does not fall into any of the previous three categories (Gruninger 2009). Some ontologies for specific processes have been developed as extensions of PSL (Deshayes, El Beqqali, and Bouras 2005;Lohse et al 2005). PSL has also served as a foundational layer for the ontological proposal of Chungoora and Young (2011).…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%