2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-62466-8_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Ontology for the Materials Design Domain

Abstract: In the materials design domain, much of the data from materials calculations are stored in different heterogeneous databases. Materials databases usually have different data models. Therefore, the users have to face the challenges to find the data from adequate sources and integrate data from multiple sources. Ontologies and ontology-based techniques can address such problems as the formal representation of domain knowledge can make data more available and interoperable among different systems. In this paper, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One example is ChEBI (Chemical Entities of Biological Interest), an ontology focused on chemical systems [16]. Another recent example is the Materials Design Ontology (MDO), an ontology defining concepts and relations useful to organize knowledge in the realm of materials design, with particular focus on solid-state physics [15]. It must be noted that despite a strong focus on specific use cases, concepts from these ontologies can in principle be reused in wider or slightly different domains.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One example is ChEBI (Chemical Entities of Biological Interest), an ontology focused on chemical systems [16]. Another recent example is the Materials Design Ontology (MDO), an ontology defining concepts and relations useful to organize knowledge in the realm of materials design, with particular focus on solid-state physics [15]. It must be noted that despite a strong focus on specific use cases, concepts from these ontologies can in principle be reused in wider or slightly different domains.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particularly relevant case is the European Materials Modelling Ontology (EMMO) [14]. Stemming from this seminal effort, many domain ontologies tailored for specific use cases were born [15,5,16]. However, for materials where aggregation properties at the molecular level are relevant, we can still face deficiencies in the development and application of structured knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, some scientific papers have been published that relate MS to semantic interoperability using ontologies. The need for further research in this field has been expressed multiple times, e.g., in terms of "interoperability" as an issue to be addressed explicitly [31,[34][35][36][37] or implicitly using the terms "data integration" [38,39], "lack of uniformity, data selectivity" [40], or "conflicting terminologies between subfields, inconsistent recording practices" [41].…”
Section: The Use Of Ontology Engineering In Materials Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most relevant contribution to the field has been provided by the development of the European Materials Modelling Ontology (EMMO) [16], which is still in progress. Beside that, domain ontologies for specific use cases related to materials also began to be developed [17]. Indeed, the broad scope of the research on materials requires an extensive work covering a manifold of different aspects and knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the broad scope of the research on materials requires an extensive work covering a manifold of different aspects and knowledge. In this context, recent work has addressed specific application domains, such as simulations of crystalline materials or single-molecule systems [17,5,18]. However, attempts in the organization of knowledge focused on materials where aggregation properties at the molecular level are relevant seem to still be lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%