2008 32nd Annual IEEE International Computer Software and Applications Conference 2008
DOI: 10.1109/compsac.2008.141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Ontology of Environments, Events, and Happenings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…An Agent has Beliefs about its Environment(s) which are the hypotheses believed to be true. These Beliefs may further become Facts if confirmed by the happenings [4] perceived by the Agents. Beliefs together with desires and intentions are important basic elements forming the behavior of an Agent.…”
Section: Psi Upper-level Ontologymentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An Agent has Beliefs about its Environment(s) which are the hypotheses believed to be true. These Beliefs may further become Facts if confirmed by the happenings [4] perceived by the Agents. Beliefs together with desires and intentions are important basic elements forming the behavior of an Agent.…”
Section: Psi Upper-level Ontologymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This model should be capable of facilitating agents reasoning about environments, events, and actions employed in decision taking procedures enacted at environmental states. These sorts of commonsense reasoning require ontological representations of time [3], environments, events and their subjective perceptions [4], processes, actions, actors, design artifacts, resources, tools [5][6][7]. The models of these domain aspects form the Core and the Extensions of PSI Suite of Ontologies v.2.1 [6] and v.2.2 [7].…”
Section: Modeling Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In difference to the mentioned EC our framework uses discrete linear time and time intervals with fuzzy beginnings and endings [9]. This enhancement makes our representation of events [10] and actions more flexible and expressive. For all other desired representational capabilities like causality, event triggering, context sensitivity, delays in effects, concurrency, release from the law of inertia [11] we rely on [8].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A DEDP State is a State S of DEDP environment which is characterized by the set of the prerequisites for the associated Actions. These pre-requisites are either the Events [10] which, if perceived as happenings [10], trigger influences that change the course of Action, the DA Representations which are required for an Action, or their combination. A DEDP State is the state of affairs in which a decision to perform one of the admisible Actions (for example, to cease the process) is to be made:…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation