2016
DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/37/12/2181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An open access database for the evaluation of heart sound algorithms

Abstract: In the past few decades, analysis of heart sound signals (i.e. the phonocardiogram or PCG), especially for automated heart sound segmentation and classification, has been widely studied and has been reported to have the potential value to detect pathology accurately in clinical applications. However, comparative analyses of algorithms in the literature have been hindered by the lack of high-quality, rigorously validated, and standardized open databases of heart sound recordings. This paper describes a public h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
494
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 583 publications
(497 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
494
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dataset used in this study comprised a training set and test set and is described more completely elsewhere [2]. The algorithm was developed in the Matlab environment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dataset used in this study comprised a training set and test set and is described more completely elsewhere [2]. The algorithm was developed in the Matlab environment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current classification algorithms typically segment and analyse specific heart sounds such as first (S1) and second (S2) heart sounds or the associated diastolic and systolic intervals [2]. However, segmentation of the heart sounds is in itself challenging, particularly in abnormal recordings where there is often less distinction between the individual heart sounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For training set an overall 3239 recordings was considered from 764 subject with 79.5% and 20.5% of the dataset corresponding to respectively normal and abnormal instances. The hidden test set comprised of 1353 recording from 308 subjects with 11.3% abnormal, 72.8% normal and 15.9% unsure instances [2].…”
Section: Challenge Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In abnormal cases, various markers maybe present beside the fundamental heart sounds such as murmurs. Murmurs are noise-like high frequency sounds and long systolic murmurs as well as diastolic and continuous murmurs are generally pathologic [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation