2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An open-label, multicentre biomarker-oriented AIO phase II trial of sunitinib for patients with chemo-refractory advanced gastric cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…42,43 Sorafenib is a potent inhibitor of Raf and other receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced gastric cancer. Sun et al 44 reported that sorafenib could inhibit the growth and angiogenesis of gastric carcinoma xenografts.…”
Section: Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-targeted Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42,43 Sorafenib is a potent inhibitor of Raf and other receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced gastric cancer. Sun et al 44 reported that sorafenib could inhibit the growth and angiogenesis of gastric carcinoma xenografts.…”
Section: Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-targeted Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were reported in 34.6 % and 29.4 % of patients, respectively [56]. In another phase II trial, 52 patients with chemo-resistant advanced GC received sunitinib as a single agent, obtaining a median OS of 5.8 months [57]. These results do not support the role of single-agent sunitinib therapy in the second line of treatment for GC, and no further clinical trials in GC were launched.…”
Section: Sunitinibmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…This was potentially ascribed to differences in treatment patterns and outcomes in Asia compared to Europe, and in particular the Americas (19). Nonetheless, these results, concerns about bleeding with squamous cell carcinomas, and the modest single agent activity for sunitinib (response rates of 3.9-12%, but median progression free survival was less than 2 months, as second line therapy) (20,21) and sorafenib (response rate of 3%, but stable disease in and 56%, median progression free survival of 3.6% in refractory disease) (22) conspired to dampen the enthusiasm for anti-VEGF therapy in gastroesophageal cancers. In contrast to these disappointing early results, in the early part of this decade, novel anti-VEGF therapies i n c l u d i n g r a m u c i r u m a b , a m o n o c l o n a l a n t i b o d y inhibiting the VEGF receptor (VEGFR), and apatinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the VEGFR have been demonstrated to produce modest single agent response rates, but significantly increased survival in the second-line setting of patients with gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.…”
Section: Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (Vegf)mentioning
confidence: 90%