2011
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-05-351833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An open-label, pilot study of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and alemtuzumab in relapsed/refractory patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The OR for all patients was 62%. This rate was comparable with that achieved in pretreated patients within the REACH trial with the FCR regimen and with FC plus alemtuzumab (OR: 69.9% and 67%, respectively) [27,28], and higher than that reported for alemtuzumab monotherapy (OR: 34%) [5]. It is noteworthy that the REACH trial did not include fludarabinerefractory patients, and the 17p deletion was present in only 7% of the patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The OR for all patients was 62%. This rate was comparable with that achieved in pretreated patients within the REACH trial with the FCR regimen and with FC plus alemtuzumab (OR: 69.9% and 67%, respectively) [27,28], and higher than that reported for alemtuzumab monotherapy (OR: 34%) [5]. It is noteworthy that the REACH trial did not include fludarabinerefractory patients, and the 17p deletion was present in only 7% of the patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…1* Alessandra Tedeschi, 1* Gianluca Gaidano, 2 Marta Coscia, 3 Valeria Belsito Petrizzi, 4 Ester Orlandi,…”
Section: Marco Montillounclassified
“…1 Higher response rates have been achieved when combined with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (FC), but this regimen has led to some safety challenges both in first-line and relapsed settings. [2][3][4] Compared to FC, bendamustine shows a better safety profile, including a lower rate of myelosuppression and infective complications, [5][6][7] and was found to be an ideal chemotherapy approach to be investigated in combination with alemtuzumab (BenCam). We conducted an Italian multicenter, single arm, open label, phase I/II study in relapsed and refractory CLL to define the efficacy and tolerability of the combination intravenous (IV) bendamustine Days 1 and 2, and subcutaneous (SC) alemtuzumab Days 1-3, following at least one line of treatment including alkylating agents or purine analogs, alone or in combination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fludarabine plus alemtuzumab yielded clearly better response rates and improved OS than fludarabine monotherapy. 61 Although high response rates have been achieved with the combination of alemtuzumab-fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide in relapsed and refractory patients, 62 experiences with this combination in the first-line setting have led to some safety challenges. A randomized study for untreated CLL patients by the French group comparing the activity of alemtuzumabfludarabine plus cyclophosphamide to rituximab-fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide was prematurely closed due to the excess of toxicity in the arm with the alemtuzumab combination.…”
Section: Alemtuzumabmentioning
confidence: 99%