An Open Science Workflow for More Credible, Rigorous Research

Corker, Katherine S.

doi:10.1017/9781108903264.012

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 76 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…• A checklist for post-publication actions after the acceptance of a manuscript (e.g generating publicity on social media [33], [34], or directly and deliberately notifying authors of key works cited in the accepted manuscript) • A data sharing checklist form, to ensure that principles of open science are upheld [35] • A workflow to systematise and make routine the proactive running of a plagiarism detector [36] on manuscripts prior to submitting them. In a context where numerous people may be involved in the production of a manuscript, there always exists a risk that one co-author may behave dishonestly and could plagiarise some text without the knowledge of the other authors.…”

Section: Name Of Proofreadermentioning

confidence: 99%

Codifying Systematic Manuscript Preparation Checklists as a Training and Productivity Resource for Research Students

Cuffe

2022

2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This papers aims to provide research students with a tool to make explicit and tangible the steps needed to efficiently produce a high-quality, polished research manuscript. The tool is implemented as a set of checklist resources to be completed by the research student at various stages of manuscript production. Fundamentally, humans are forgetful and are typically poor at consistently executing multi-part procedures in a systematic way. The simple technology of checklists overcome this weakness of human cognition. The checklists themselves function as a learning re-enforcement aide, ensuring that students methodically and repeatedly work through the prescribed workflow for manuscript production and proofreading. Interactive pdf documents were chosen as a suitable educational technology to implement these checklist resources. Such pdf documents contain fillable boxes that can be completed and saved by the user, avoiding the need to print, scan or manually edit such forms. Embedding quality control and proof-reading feedback in such digital documents promotes good record keeping and captures the progression of a manuscript though its different stages of drafting.

show abstract

Section: Name Of Proofreadermentioning

confidence: 99%

Codifying Systematic Manuscript Preparation Checklists as a Training and Productivity Resource for Research Students

Cuffe

2022

2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

An Open Science Workflow for More Credible, Rigorous Research

Cited by 1 publication

References 76 publications

Codifying Systematic Manuscript Preparation Checklists as a Training and Productivity Resource for Research Students

Codifying Systematic Manuscript Preparation Checklists as a Training and Productivity Resource for Research Students

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About