1999
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-99-05038-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An open set of maps for which every point is absolutely nonshadowable

Abstract: Abstract. We consider a class of nonhyperbolic systems, for which there are two fixed points in an attractor having a dense trajectory; the unstable manifold of one has dimension one and the other's is two dimensional. Under the condition that there exists a direction which is more expanding than other directions, we show that such attractors are nonshadowable. Using this theorem, we prove that there is an open set of diffeomorphisms (in the C rtopology, r > 1) for which every point is absolutely nonshadowable… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The partially hyperbolic assumption prevents this pseudo-orbit from being shadowed by a true g-orbit (this is proved in [2,Lemma 3.12], see also [12,44] where the similar arguments are used). Therefore, N is an open set of diffeomorphisms which do not satisfy the shadowing property.…”
Section: Lemma 66mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The partially hyperbolic assumption prevents this pseudo-orbit from being shadowed by a true g-orbit (this is proved in [2,Lemma 3.12], see also [12,44] where the similar arguments are used). Therefore, N is an open set of diffeomorphisms which do not satisfy the shadowing property.…”
Section: Lemma 66mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recall that Theorem 1.17 claims that every diffeomorphism with a co-index 1 cycle is in the closure of an open set of Diff 1 (M ) of diffeomorphism which do not satisfy the shadowing property. The proof of Theorem 1.17 follows using the arguments in [2, Theorem 1] (in its turn, these arguments are an adaptation of the ones in [12,44]). Let us sketch these arguments.…”
Section: The Definition Of the Perturbation And The Choice Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FE property implies shadowing fails, as was established by Dawson et al [16]. Homogeneous chaotic systems can have the shadowing property but hetero-chaotic systems cannot, as shown for UDV in [25][26][27].…”
Section: Hetero-chaos Connects Many Phenomena Like Fluctuating Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first observation is that one cannot expect to recover the shadowing property, at least in its full strength, for general partially hyperbolic systems. In fact, it was observed in [8] that the shadowing property is not verified (not even generically) for partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms which are robustly transitive (see also [1,25] for examples of some large classes of non-uniformly hyperbolic systems that do not satisfy the shadowing property). On the other hand, as we are going to see in the sequel, it is possible to get a weaker version of the shadowing property called quasi-shadowing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%