2014
DOI: 10.1111/epi.12827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An open‐source automated platform for three‐dimensional visualization of subdural electrodes using CT‐MRI coregistration

Abstract: Objective Visualizing implanted subdural electrodes in 3D space can greatly aid planning, executing, and validating resection in epilepsy surgery. Coregistration software is available, but cost, complexity, insufficient accuracy or validation limit adoption. We present a fully automated open-source application, based upon a novel method using post-implant CT and post-implant MR images, for accurately visualizing intracranial electrodes in 3D space. Methods CT-MR rigid brain coregistration, MR non-rigid regis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To define the resection boundaries and the position of implanted electrodes, preoperative volumetric MRIs (1.5T or 3T) were coregistered to postimplantation CT scans and postresection MRIs using the Advanced Normalization Tools, 23 C3D, 24 FSL (Oxford, UK), and AMIRA (FEI Figure 1 Diagnostic algorithm using the SOZ and PLHG metrics, and resulting surgical outcome classification…”
Section: Classification Of Electrodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To define the resection boundaries and the position of implanted electrodes, preoperative volumetric MRIs (1.5T or 3T) were coregistered to postimplantation CT scans and postresection MRIs using the Advanced Normalization Tools, 23 C3D, 24 FSL (Oxford, UK), and AMIRA (FEI Figure 1 Diagnostic algorithm using the SOZ and PLHG metrics, and resulting surgical outcome classification…”
Section: Classification Of Electrodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method we used to isolate the electrode implant from the CT images in our preparation was based on the observation that voxels representing the electrode implant had higher intensity values than anything else in the image (including the skull) and appeared with a very low probability. This feature of electrodes has been found in CT images of human deep brain stimulators as well (Azarion et al, 2014). Taking advantage of these features, the most straight-forward way to mask out the electrode implant was to estimate a probability density function of the intensity values in each of the CT image volumes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…This process differs from previously published CT-MR registration procedures that register CT images of an individual to MR images of that same individual (Azarion et al, 2014; Maintz et al, 1996; Mirzadeh et al, 2014; Princich et al, 2013; Vaquero et al, 2001), or registration procedures that register MR images of one individual to a canonical MR atlas (Sergejeva et al, 2015). Since metal artifacts prevented the acquisition of MR images from implanted rats, the registration process for the present application had to both cross modalities (CT to MR) and individual specimens (an individual CT scan to an atlas representing the average of 5 other specimens).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patient MR image is non-rigidly registered to the NIREP atlas using cross-correlation as the similarity metric. The high level of accuracy of our co-registration method was quantitatively confirmed [18]. The images are all in the patient’s original T1 image coordinate frame.…”
Section: Imaging Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In addition to these iEEG tools, the web console also contains a BrainMapper application, which is an easy to use “drag and drop” application that automatically co-registers CT and MRI electrode implantation images in order to provide an accurate and reliable 3D reconstruction of the electrodes on the surface of a patient’s brain [18]. Figure 3a shows a snapshot of the BrainMapper application.…”
Section: Imaging Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%