2018
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/aae021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An open source benchmarked toolbox for cardiovascular waveform and interval analysis

Abstract: Existing HRV toolboxes do not include standardized preprocessing, signal quality indices (for noisy segment removal), and abnormal rhythm detection and are therefore likely to lead to significant errors in the presence of moderate to high noise or arrhythmias. We therefore describe the inclusion of validated tools to address these issues. We also make recommendations for default values and testing/reporting.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
181
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
181
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the wide use of these HRV indices, there is still ambiguity in the research community emerging from the lack of clear documentation, validation, and standardization of different HRV signal processing methods. Here for HRV analysis, we used a MATLAB-based open source HRV toolbox that was previously validated with a variety of HRV measurement techniques and platforms to calculate LF HRV, HF HRV, LF/HF HRV, SD1, SD2, SD1/ SD2 [91].…”
Section: Signal Processing and Parameter Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the wide use of these HRV indices, there is still ambiguity in the research community emerging from the lack of clear documentation, validation, and standardization of different HRV signal processing methods. Here for HRV analysis, we used a MATLAB-based open source HRV toolbox that was previously validated with a variety of HRV measurement techniques and platforms to calculate LF HRV, HF HRV, LF/HF HRV, SD1, SD2, SD1/ SD2 [91].…”
Section: Signal Processing and Parameter Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cardiac activity data were acquired using bipolar ECG while acquiring the MEG data, and processed using PhysioNet Cardiovascular Signal Toolbox (Goldberger et al, 2000;Vest et al, 2018) in Matlab (MATLAB 2017b, The MathWorks Inc, Natick, MA). To address non-stationarity in ECG recordings, mean heart rate (HR) and hearth rate variability (HRV) summary measures were based on the median across multiple sliding 5-min windows in 30-second steps across the entire eyes-closed, resting-state acquisition, 8.5 minutes.…”
Section: Physiological Recordingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of cardiovascular health, there may be more important measures that were not present in the CamCAN sample. Moreover, the analysis of heart rate variability estimates was based on normal-to-normal beats (Vest et al, 2018). The difference between NN-and RR-beat analysis is that the former considers the detection and exclusion of segments and participants with atrial fibrillation and other abnormal beats.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Popular free HRV software libraries includes: Kubios [5], PhysioNet Cardiovascular Signal Toolbox [6,7], RHRV [8,9], ARTiiFACT [10], HRVAS [11], SinusCor [12], and hrvanalysis 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HRV indices are computed, results are shown, and the exports made available. The tools differ in providing open access to the made calculations, the usage of HRV indices, the filtering of IBIs for robust measures, accepted data formats, the style of data representation, and user-friendly handling [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%