2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2204.11905
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An open-source linear program for testing nonclassicality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be done using recently proposed quantum circuits that measure weak values [12,14]. We also remark on the relevance of recently established connections between unitary invariants and contextuality [15], together with techniques for testing contextuality without relying on operational constraints [16][17][18]. These results enable us here to present simple ways to robustly quantify contextuality using measurements of weak values, allowing novel simplified tests of contextuality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This could be done using recently proposed quantum circuits that measure weak values [12,14]. We also remark on the relevance of recently established connections between unitary invariants and contextuality [15], together with techniques for testing contextuality without relying on operational constraints [16][17][18]. These results enable us here to present simple ways to robustly quantify contextuality using measurements of weak values, allowing novel simplified tests of contextuality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…If g(φ, ψ|a i ) > 1 holds, then letting S = {|φ , |ψ , |a 1 , |a 2 , |φ ⊥ , |ψ ⊥ }, where |φ ⊥ is the antipodal state of |φ in the Bloch sphere, and effects E = S, then it can be shown that the fragment (S, E) cannot have a noncontextual explanation. To robustly test this, one can use linear programming techniques that will indicate presence of contextuality directly, and moreover return robustness to depolarizing [18] and dephasing noise [52]. The case for d > 2, or anomalous imaginary values of g are not so direct but can also be analysed with the tools discussed here.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the proof does not actually use the full geometric structure of accessible GPT fragments but only that of a "GPT fragment," see Ref [104]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%