2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.07.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An operator splitting method for the Degasperis–Procesi equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8. This result is similar to the results presented in [7], we can observe that a structured peakon train is generated gradually. Furthermore, we compare the conservative quantities preserved by different methods in Fig.…”
Section: General Initial Value Problemssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…8. This result is similar to the results presented in [7], we can observe that a structured peakon train is generated gradually. Furthermore, we compare the conservative quantities preserved by different methods in Fig.…”
Section: General Initial Value Problemssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Based on above results, Matsuno obtained the multisoliton solutions of the DP equation for the case κ = 0 [6]. Furthermore, Lundmark and Szmigielski found the explicit form of multipeakon solutions for κ = 0 by solving an inverse scattering problem of a discrete cubic string [7][8][9]. Additionally, the peakon solutions for these two equations are orbitally stable [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Important questions of stability and general analytic results dealing with DP peakons and the DP wave breaking have been addressed [15][16][17][18]. A considerable amount of work has been also carried out on adapting numerical schemes to deal with the DP equation; we just mention a few: an operator splitting method of Feng & Liu [19], or numerical schemes discussed by Coclite et al [20] and Hoel [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li and Olver [28] established the local well-posedness of the CH equation in the nonhomogeneous Sobolev space H s with s > 3/2. Numerical strategies for solving the CH equation include finite difference methods [10,23], pseudo-spectral methods [27,24], local discontinuous Galerkin method [40], operator splitting methods [5,16], multi-symplectic methods [12,13,44] and other effective methods (e.g., see Refs. [8,17]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%