2001
DOI: 10.1007/s003400100722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An optical conveyor belt for single neutral atoms

Abstract: Using optical dipole forces we have realized controlled transport of a single or any desired small number of neutral atoms over a distance of a centimeter with sub-micrometer precision. A standing wave dipole trap is loaded with a prescribed number of cesium atoms from a magneto-optical trap. Mutual detuning of the counterpropagating laser beams moves the interference pattern, allowing us to accelerate and stop the atoms at preselected points along the standing wave. The transportation efficiency is close to 1… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
105
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
105
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…where ∆ eff = −1.2×10 7 Γ is an effective detuning, taking into account the weighted contributions of the D 1 and D 2 lines [10]. ω hfs = 2.0×10 3 Γ is the ground state hyperfine splitting.…”
Section: A Differential Light Shift and Decay Of Ramsey Fringesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ∆ eff = −1.2×10 7 Γ is an effective detuning, taking into account the weighted contributions of the D 1 and D 2 lines [10]. ω hfs = 2.0×10 3 Γ is the ground state hyperfine splitting.…”
Section: A Differential Light Shift and Decay Of Ramsey Fringesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetic traps can be translated by moving the coils mechanically [5], by timevarying currents in a lithographic conductor pattern [17], or on a conveyor belt with a chain of permanent magnets [18]. Optical traps can be used as optical tweezers whose focal point is translated by moving mechanically lenses [4,19], or by traveling lattices (conveyor belts) made with two counterpropagating beams slightly detuned one respect to each other [15,16,20]. There are also mixed magneto-optical approaches [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For larger 1/τ -values, the experimental data falls off faster than predicted by theory. This is most probably due to the increasing excitation of axial oscillations of the atoms inside the potential wells caused by the abrupt changes in acceleration, which further reduce adiabaticity [10]. For 1/τ < 0.05 ms −1 the experimental data also falls below the theoretical curve.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…They interfere and produce a chain of potential wells of typically 1 mK depth. Further details can be found in previous publications [10,13].As qubit states we employ the outermost Zeeman sublevels |F = 4, m F = 4 (|0 ) and |F = 3, m F = 3 (|1 ) of the two 6S 1/2 hyperfine ground states with a transition frequency ω at /2π near 9.2 GHz. In order to spectroscopically distinguish atoms at different positions along the dipole trap axis we apply a magnetic field gradient of 13 G/cm along this axis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation