1999
DOI: 10.1090/s0025-5718-99-01013-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An optimal domain decomposition preconditioner for low-frequency time-harmonic Maxwell equations

Abstract: Abstract. The time-harmonic Maxwell equations are considered in the lowfrequency case. A finite element domain decomposition approach is proposed for the numerical approximation of the exact solution. This leads to an iteration-by-subdomain procedure, which is proven to converge. The rate of convergence turns out to be independent of the mesh size, showing that the preconditioner implicitly defined by the iterative procedure is optimal. For obtaining this convergence result it has been necessary to prove a reg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
153
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
153
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These moments are defined if u ∈ H r (Ω) and ∇ × u ∈ H r (Ω) for some r > 1/2, or if u ∈ H 1+ (Ω) for some > 0 (see [1]). Unfortunately the moments are not defined in general for u ∈ H 1 (Ω), which is a complicating factor in the analysis.…”
Section: Tetrahedral Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These moments are defined if u ∈ H r (Ω) and ∇ × u ∈ H r (Ω) for some r > 1/2, or if u ∈ H 1+ (Ω) for some > 0 (see [1]). Unfortunately the moments are not defined in general for u ∈ H 1 (Ω), which is a complicating factor in the analysis.…”
Section: Tetrahedral Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The matrices ε and µ are assumed to be uniformly positive definite in Ω. (A matrix ζ(x) is uniformly positive definite in Ω if there exists a constant ζ * > 0 such that 3 l,m=1 ζ l,m (x)ξ l ξ m ≥ ζ * |ξ ξ ξ| 2 for almost all x ∈ Ω and for all ξ ξ ξ ∈ C 3 .) The conductivity σ is an uniformly positive definite matrix in a conductor and it is equal to 0 in an insulator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming J ∈ (L 2 (Ω)) 3 , and setting, for simplifying notation, F = iωJ, the weak formulation of the boundary value problem (2-3) reads:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations