1986
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(86)80014-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An optimal inspection and replacement policy under incomplete state information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before presenting Proposition 3, we state several wellknown (cf. Rosenfield [6], White [9], Ohnishi [4]) results via Propositions 1 and 2.…”
Section: Preliminary Definitions and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Before presenting Proposition 3, we state several wellknown (cf. Rosenfield [6], White [9], Ohnishi [4]) results via Propositions 1 and 2.…”
Section: Preliminary Definitions and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For example, Givon and Grosfeld-Nir [12] develop a model for the replacement of TV shows that can also be applied to the replacement of binary-state systems, and their Proposition 1 is akin to our Corollary 1, but they assume that c r = 0 and p 22 = 1. Structural results by Ohnishi et al [30] on the optimal inspection and replacement policy for multi-state systems imply a threshold structure for the optimal policy in the binary-state case, but their results do not characterize this threshold structure in the same detail as in Corollaries 1 and 2, and their assumptions require c d ≥ c r and p 22 ≥ p 12 . The special case we consider here also is a special case of the model of Dada and Marcellus [7], who distinguish between "routine maintenance" and "learning maintenance."…”
Section: Special Case Without Sensor Deteriorationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There exist models in which costless, imperfect observations of the state of the system are made at every decision epoch (White , Ghasemi et al , Grosfeld‐Nir ) and models in which an observation of the state of the system is only made at a decision epoch if it is decided to conduct a costly inspection (Ross , Rosenfield , Maillart and Zheltova ). The combination of costless, imperfect observations and costly observations is considered in White and Ohnishi et al . In all papers listed above, it is assumed that the probabilistic relation between the state of the system and the observation that is obtained, which in POMDP models is described by an (action‐dependent) observation matrix, is stationary over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a policy exists 11,13 that achieves this minimum cost. This optimal policy is stationary; (δ * ) ∞ , where the control function δ * selects the minimizing alternative in the relation (6).…”
Section: The Pomdp Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Unfortunately, the computational burden associated with solving POMDPs is overwhelming, precluding their application to problems of practical size. [11][12][13] Computing the exact optimal finite or infinite horizon solution of a POMDP is generally extremely computationally intractable. For this reason many researchers consider approximation scheme for planning in partially stochastic domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%