2009
DOI: 10.1063/1.3103930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An “optimal” spawning algorithm for adaptive basis set expansion in nonadiabatic dynamics

Abstract: The full multiple spawning (FMS) method has been developed to simulate quantum dynamics in the multistate electronic problem. In FMS, the nuclear wave function is represented in a basis of coupled, frozen Gaussians, and a "spawning" procedure prescribes a means of adaptively increasing the size of this basis in order to capture population transfer between electronic states. Herein we detail a new algorithm for specifying the initial conditions of newly spawned basis functions that minimizes the number of spawn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
93
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
2
93
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, under the same initial conditions as the current study, using our present analytical coupling code but with momentum adjustment along the energy difference gradient (as done in the previous study) the excitedstate lifetime was increased by about 10%. This is expected since the spawned basis functions will tend to have lower (in magnitude) Hamiltonian matrix elements with the parent TBF for momentum The Journal of Physical Chemistry A ARTICLE a d j u s t m e n t st h a ta r en o ta l o n gt h e nonadiabatic coupling vector 34 (this is the essence of the semiclassical argument 35 for using the nonadiabatic coupling vector as the momentum adjustment direction in surface hopping).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, under the same initial conditions as the current study, using our present analytical coupling code but with momentum adjustment along the energy difference gradient (as done in the previous study) the excitedstate lifetime was increased by about 10%. This is expected since the spawned basis functions will tend to have lower (in magnitude) Hamiltonian matrix elements with the parent TBF for momentum The Journal of Physical Chemistry A ARTICLE a d j u s t m e n t st h a ta r en o ta l o n gt h e nonadiabatic coupling vector 34 (this is the essence of the semiclassical argument 35 for using the nonadiabatic coupling vector as the momentum adjustment direction in surface hopping).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In AIMS, this flexibility is attained by adaptively increasing the number of TBFs, in a process called spawning, when the coupling of two states rises above a predefined threshold. As discussed in detail previously, 15,31,34 the nonadiabatic coupling vectors are used in AIMS in three ways: (1) to construct the Hamiltonian matrix elements in eq 5, (2) to decide when spawning occurs, and (3) to determine the momentum of the newly created child TBF's following spawning. In the first two uses, one does not need the entire nonadiabatic coupling vector but rather only the dot product with a (complex) off-diagonal matrix element of the momentum operator.…”
Section: Theoretical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This behavior contrasts with that of the spin-diabatic TSH dynamics, where a large number of hops between states are observed. 13 As discussed in detail in the AIMS literature, 22,35 improving the spawning criterion would surely result in an even better match with the exact result. We intend to investigate potential improvements in the spawning criteria for ISC in future research.…”
Section: Test Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For detailed discussions about the spawning algorithm between same-spin states, the reader is referred to previous works. 22,24,35 In GFMS, the spawning algorithm needs to be extended to allow for spawning between spinorbit coupled states. Based on an already proposed effective coupling between diabatic states, 22 we suggest to measure the effective SOC strength between state I and state J at the position of TBF k as…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless an ab initio on-the-fly direct dynamics version of vMCG does exist. 33 The AIMS 10,24,[34][35][36] method uses a much simpler choice for the evolution of the TBFs: their phase space centers evolve classically on a specific electronic state and the basis set is expanded adaptively as needed, in a process called spawning. The spawning becomes particularly important near the intersection with another electronic state, where more Gaussians are spawned on the second PES.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%