2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.crma.2016.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An optimization method for elastic shape matching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They do not allow for general deformations of source vertices onto the target surface, and the approach is quite heavy computationally due to the use of the product manifold. The elastic matching of volumetric shapes from the perspective of shape optimization has been investigated by Buhan et al [dBDFN16]. Finally, Iglesias et al [IRS18] have applied elastic energies for computing correspondences between level‐set surfaces.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They do not allow for general deformations of source vertices onto the target surface, and the approach is quite heavy computationally due to the use of the product manifold. The elastic matching of volumetric shapes from the perspective of shape optimization has been investigated by Buhan et al [dBDFN16]. Finally, Iglesias et al [IRS18] have applied elastic energies for computing correspondences between level‐set surfaces.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Functionals of the form (19), based on the signed distance function have already been used in [28] (or prior in [11]) in the contexts of shape morphing and shape registration. • Different functionals P (Ω) from (19) could be devised for the same shape matching purpose; for instance, one may imagine using a least-square functional of the form:…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a first experiment, we seek to minimize the compliance of the considered structures, under a volume constraint, namely: (28) min…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations