2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-021-06373-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Optimized Geometry of Double-Cone Compression Test Samples for a Better Control of Strain Rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The double cone geometry [10,11] offers the possibility to generate a range of plastic strain (0.4 to 1.3 with the employed geometry) along the radial direction of the sample. The cylinder geometry is used to obtain the flow curves from the compression tests when required in addition to the microstructure analyses (flow curves not shown here, being out of the scope of the paper).…”
Section: B Hot Compression Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The double cone geometry [10,11] offers the possibility to generate a range of plastic strain (0.4 to 1.3 with the employed geometry) along the radial direction of the sample. The cylinder geometry is used to obtain the flow curves from the compression tests when required in addition to the microstructure analyses (flow curves not shown here, being out of the scope of the paper).…”
Section: B Hot Compression Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gariglio et al. optimized the size of the double‐cone specimen to provide a homogeneous uniform equivalent strain rate [16] and solve the heterogeneity problem of the strain rate field in the double‐cone specimen. In our previous work, the double cone compression test was applied to construct the hot deformation mechanism diagram of the titanium alloy [17] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%